首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Project Management >Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects
【24h】

Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects

机译:跨国比较公私合作项目的关键驱动因素,关键成功因素和风险分配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are an effective and established strategy for procuring infrastructure. Although numerous countries have implemented PPPs for infrastructure development in recent years, not all projects have been successful. Most PPP failures result from inappropriate risk allocation and a lack of information on success factors in specific countries. For this study, we compared the categories of key drivers, critical success factors (CSFs), and preferred risk allocation in PPPs established in Taiwan, Singapore, China, the United Kingdom, and Indonesia. Mean value analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and dimensional importance were used to analyze and compare these categories. Data on PPPs in Taiwan, Singapore, China, and the United Kingdom were obtained through comprehensive literature reviews. Data for Indonesia were obtained through structured surveys distributed to PPP practitioners and academicians. Considering Indonesia as the baseline, the results revealed that Indonesia and Taiwan exhibit several similar indicators of key drivers. Furthermore, comparisons with several countries revealed that Indonesian CSFs are most similar to those of China. Regarding risk allocation preference, the analytical results indicated that Singapore exhibits the most similarity with Indonesia. This study provides useful information for people seeking to invest in PPP projects, enabling them to enhance their understanding of key drivers, CSFs, and risk allocation in the researched countries. Based on our findings, international investors can apply investment strategies by considering the similarities and differences in each country. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
机译:公私伙伴关系是购买基础设施的有效和既定战略。尽管近年来许多国家已经为基础设施开发实施了PPP,但并非所有项目都成功。多数PPP失败的原因是风险分配不当以及特定国家/地区缺乏有关成功因素的信息。在本研究中,我们比较了在台湾,新加坡,中国,英国和印度尼西亚建立的PPP中关键驱动因素,关键成功因素(CSF)和首选风险分配的类别。均值分析,验证性因素分析和尺寸重要性用于分析和比较这些类别。台湾,新加坡,中国和英国的PPP数据是通过综合文献综述获得的。印度尼西亚的数据是通过向PPP从业人员和院士分发的结构化调查获得的。以印度尼西亚为基准,结果显示印度尼西亚和台湾表现出几个类似的关键驱动因素指标。此外,与几个国家的比较显示,印尼的CSF与中国的CSF最相似。关于风险分配偏好,分析结果表明,新加坡与印度尼西亚的相似性最高。这项研究为寻求在PPP项目上投资的人们提供了有用的信息,使他们能够加深对研究国家中主要驱动因素,CSF和风险分配的理解。根据我们的发现,国际投资者可以通过考虑每个国家的异同来应用投资策略。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd. APM和IPMA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号