首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >A comparison of JIT and TOC buffering philosophies on system performance with unplanned machine downtime
【24h】

A comparison of JIT and TOC buffering philosophies on system performance with unplanned machine downtime

机译:JIT和TOC缓冲原理对系统性能与计划外停机时间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The impact of buffering under just in time (JIT) and theory of constraints (TOC) is studied to determine whether a difference in performance exists in systems faced with unplanned machine downtime. Comparisons are based on results obtained from simulation of a five-station cell utilised in computer substrate manufacturing. Analysis of the simulation output suggests that the TOC technique, drum-buffer-rope (DBR), achieves higher levels of performance as measured by total output and lead time while reducing inventory requirements relative to the tested JIT technique, Kanban. Improved system performance stems from the strategic placement of buffers in DBR, which maximises protection of the constraint from variation rather than attempting to protect each individual station. Further, analysis suggests that DBR systems are more robust than JIT systems in that they are able to maintain higher levels of system performance across a range of inventory levels.
机译:研究了准时缓冲(JIT)和约束理论(TOC)的影响,以确定面对计划外的机器停机时间的系统是否存在性能差异。比较是基于从计算机基板制造中使用的五工位单元的仿真获得的结果。对模拟输出的分析表明,通过总输出量和交货时间来衡量,TOC技术鼓式缓冲绳索(DBR)可以达到更高的性能水平,同时相对于经过测试的JIT技术看板可以减少库存需求。系统性能的提高源于在DBR中策略性地放置缓冲区,从而最大程度地保护了约束不受变化的影响,而不是尝试保护每个单独的站点。此外,分析表明,DBR系统比JIT系统更强大,因为它们能够在一系列清单级别上维持更高级别的系统性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号