首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Primatology >Archaeological Analysis Does Not Support Intentionality in the Production of Brushed Ends on Chimpanzee Termiting Tools
【24h】

Archaeological Analysis Does Not Support Intentionality in the Production of Brushed Ends on Chimpanzee Termiting Tools

机译:考古分析不支持在黑猩猩发射工具上刷制末端的意图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some chimpanzees use 2 types of tools to extract underground termites for consumption. Chimpanzees insert thin, flexible probes into tunnels or holes in termite mounds (fishing), and sometimes use stouter, rigid sticks to first puncture the holes and also possibly to fish. Many puncturing sticks have distinctive “brushed” ends. Researchers have hypothesized that chimpanzees create the brushed ends intentionally to increase their affixibility to biting termites (Sugiyama, 1985). The results of our archaeological analysis of a large collection of puncturing sticks used by Central African chimpanzees falsifies this hypothesis, and instead agrees with the recent behavioral observations of Sanz et al. (2004; cf. Bermejo and Illera, 1999) that brushing is a coincidental result of procuring sticks from vegetation sources. The results highlight the positive contribution of an archaeological approach to problems in chimpanzee material culture and emphasize to primatologists the value of curating artifacts.
机译:一些黑猩猩使用两种工具来提取地下白蚁以供食用。黑猩猩将细长的,柔软的探针插入白蚁丘的隧道或洞中(捕鱼),有时用坚硬,坚硬的棍棒先刺破这些洞,甚至钓鱼。许多刺针都有独特的“刷头”末端。研究人员假设黑猩猩有意制造刷毛末端,以增加其对咬住白蚁的附着力(Sugiyama,1985)。我们对中非黑猩猩使用的大量刺针的大量考古分析结果证实了这一假说,相反,它与Sanz等人最近的行为观察结果一致。 (2004年;参见Bermejo和Illera,1999年),刷牙是从植被来源购买木棍的偶然结果。结果突出了考古学方法对黑猩猩物质文化问题的积极贡献,并向灵长类动物学家强调了策展文物的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号