首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management >A content analysis of research approaches in logistics research
【24h】

A content analysis of research approaches in logistics research

机译:物流研究中研究方法的内容分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Based on a framework developed by Kovacs and Spens, this paper seeks to assess the use of the three different research approaches in logistics research; discuss the use of different research methods within the three research approaches; find and discuss applications of the abductive research approach to logistics problems. Design/methodology/approach - Content analysis is used in order to categorize the different research approaches. While content analysis commonly uses smaller units such as paragraphs, sentences, words or characters, this study used entire articles as the unit of analysis. The scope of the review encompassed five years (1998-2002) of articles in IJLM, IJPDLM and JBL. A total of 378 articles was reviewed and categorized. Findings - The findings of the study corroborate earlier studies regarding the main research approach used in logistics. Published logistics research is hypothetico-deductive, with a strong emphasis on using survey methods. Nevertheless, inductive as well as abductive research is gaining importance. However, most logistics articles do not explicitly discuss the research process, nor the approach used. Therefore, a call for more explicit statements of the research approach is suggested, Research limitations/implications - The review of the articles is limited to three main journals in the field. A more comprehensive view of research approaches could be obtained by broadening the review to include also other types of research. Practical implications - The paper provides a framework and guidelines to researchers for explicitly discussing the research approach used in logistics articles. Originality/value - The paper provides an overview of the research approaches used in logistics research.
机译:目的-基于Kovacs和Spens开发的框架,本文旨在评估物流研究中三种不同研究方法的使用。讨论三种研究方法中不同研究方法的使用;找到并讨论绑架研究方法在物流问题中的应用。设计/方法/方法-内容分析用于对不同的研究方法进行分类。内容分析通常使用较小的单位,例如段落,句子,单词或字符,但本研究使用整篇文章作为分析单位。审查的范围包括IJLM,IJPDLM和JBL中的五年(1998-2002年)文章。总共378条文章进行了审查和分类。结果-研究结果证实了有关物流中主要研究方法的早期研究。已发表的物流研究是假设推论的,特别强调使用调查方法。然而,归纳和归纳研究变得越来越重要。但是,大多数物流文章都没有明确讨论研究过程或所用方法。因此,建议对研究方法进行更明确的陈述,即研究局限性/含义-文章的审阅仅限于该领域的三本主要期刊。通过扩大评论范围,使其也包括其他类型的研究,可以获得研究方法的更全面的观点。实际意义-本文为研究人员提供了一个框架和指南,用于明确讨论物流文章中使用的研究方法。原创性/价值-本文概述了物流研究中使用的研究方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号