...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of managerial and financial accounting >Reactions of the Tunisian capital market to audit reports: a comparison between reports established by the Big Four and No-Big Four auditors
【24h】

Reactions of the Tunisian capital market to audit reports: a comparison between reports established by the Big Four and No-Big Four auditors

机译:突尼斯资本市场对审计报告的反应:四大审计师和非四大审计师建立的报告之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study is to test empirically whether there is a relationship between audit reports signed by Big Four or No-Big Four external auditors and stock prices in the Tunisian financial capital market. For this purpose, we use the event study methodology. Based on a sample of 51 listed companies on the Tunis Stock Exchange for the period 2002-2007, we observe that the significant positive price reactions is only reported eight days after the disclosure of unqualified audit reports issued by the No-Big Four auditors. On the other hand, our findings show that qualifications expressed in the audit reports issued by the Big four auditors do not provide investors with information content different from qualifications issued in reports by No-Big Four auditors.
机译:本研究的目的是凭经验检验四大或四大外部审计师签署的审计报告与突尼斯金融资本市场的股价之间是否存在关联。为此,我们使用事件研究方法。根据2002年至2007年突尼斯证券交易所51家上市公司的样本,我们观察到重大的价格积极反应仅在披露由四大会计师事务所发布的无保留意见的审计报告后八天才报告。另一方面,我们的发现表明,四大核数师发布的审计报告中表达的资格没有为投资者提供与四大核数师发布的报告中所包含的资格不同的信息内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号