首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Learning and Change >Benchmarking in the national intellectual capital measurement: is it the best available approach?
【24h】

Benchmarking in the national intellectual capital measurement: is it the best available approach?

机译:衡量国家智力资本的基准:这是最佳的方法吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sustainable economic development is an aspiration of every nation in today's knowledge economy. Scientists for a few decades claim that intellectual capital management is the answer how to reach this goal. Currently, benchmarking methodology is the most common approach in the national intellectual capital measurement intended to provide information for management purposes. The aim of this paper is to identify advantages and disadvantages of this methodological approach and provide the answer to the question whether it is the most appropriate one. The most popular methods based on the benchmarking methodology (NICI, ICM, ICI, NIC40, ELSS) are analysed and compared within the paper. Advantages and disadvantages of benchmarking are thoroughly investigated with regard to measurement objectives, validity and applicability of the results as well as other contextual characteristics. Findings of the paper reveal that application of NIC benchmarking needs clearly defined particular purpose and must be handled with a great caution.
机译:可持续的经济发展是当今知识经济中每个国家的愿望。几十年来,科学家声称智力资本管理是实现这一目标的答案。当前,基准法是国家智力资本计量中最常用的方法,旨在为管理目的提供信息。本文的目的是确定这种方法的优缺点,并为是否最合适的方法提供答案。本文对基于基准测试方法(NICI,ICM,ICI,NIC40,ELSS)的最流行方法进行了分析和比较。在测量目标,结果的有效性和适用性以及其他上下文特征方面,对基准测试的优缺点进行了彻底调查。本文的发现表明,NIC基准测试的应用需要明确定义特定的目的,并且必须非常谨慎地进行处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号