...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law in the built environment >The abolition of the 'contracts in writing' rule in the 2009 Construction Act Potential implications for UK adjudication
【24h】

The abolition of the 'contracts in writing' rule in the 2009 Construction Act Potential implications for UK adjudication

机译:取消2009年《建筑法》中的“书面合同”规则可能对英国的裁决产生影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The UK construction industry has been at the forefront of finding efficient, cost-effective and fair methods of resolving disputes. Therefore, to ensure the 1996 Act is more effective in achieving its intended objective, the new Act came into force on the 1 October 2011 in England and Wales, and 1 November 2011 in Scotland. The purpose of this paper is to explore one of the most important amendments in the new Act, the abolition of the "contract in writing" rule. The extent to which the UK industry is aware of the likely implications of the abolition of the "contracts in writing" rule in the new Act on the adjudication has not been empirically explored - which is the core reason d'etre of this paper. Design/methodology/approach - A web-based, online questionnaire survey method was employed to collect data. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse the data obtained from the 102 completed and usable questionnaires for inference and conclusion. This research employed t-tests to compare means of small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large organisations. Findings - The findings suggests that the UK construction industry is well aware of the abolition of the "contracts in writing" rule in the new Act and the industry perception is that it is good for their business. The survey revealed that the amended rule in the new Act would significantly increase number of adjudications, number of hearings before the adjudicator, assessment of witness evidence, costs of the adjudication process, and timescale of an adjudication process. The three most important challenges to the adjudication process with the amended rule in the new Act include: assessment of wholly oral or partly oral contract terms that were agreed, availability of evidence, and availability of information. There are no significant statistical variations between the responses of the SMEs and large organisations. Practical implications - The paper concludes that the new Act will have significant impact on the UK adjudication. Therefore, the UK industry urgently needs to adopt and become accustomed to quite significant changes in the new Act. It is advised that an industry-wide awareness-raising programme on the new Act needs to be developed and deployed. Originality/value - The paper improves understanding and awareness of the construction industry professionals regarding the likely implications of the abolition of the "contracts in writing" rule in the new Act on the adjudication.
机译:目的-英国建筑业一直在寻找解决争端的有效,具有成本效益和公平的方法的最前沿。因此,为确保1996年文本更有效地实现其预期目标,新文本于2011年10月1日在英格兰和威尔士生效,2011年11月1日在苏格兰生效。本文的目的是探讨新法案中最重要的修正案之一,即废除“书面合同”规则。尚未从经验上探索英国工业界在多大程度上意识到废除新的裁决法中的“书面合同”规则可能产生的影响,这是本文的核心原因。设计/方法/方法-基于网络的在线问卷调查方法用于收集数据。描述性分析用于分析从102份完整且可用的调查表中获得的数据,以进行推断和结论。这项研究采用t检验比较中小型企业(SME)和大型组织的均值。调查结果-调查结果表明,英国建筑业非常了解新法案中“书面合同”规定的废除,并且业界认为这对他们的业务有利。调查显示,新法案中的修订规则将显着增加裁决的数量,裁决者的听证次数,证人证据的评估,裁决过程的成本以及裁决过程的时限。新法案修订规则对裁决程序的三个最重要挑战包括:评估已达成一致的全部口头或部分口头合同条款,证据的可获得性和信息的可获得性。中小企业与大型组织的回应之间没有显着的统计差异。实际意义-本文得出的结论是,新法案将对英国的裁决产生重大影响。因此,英国工业迫切需要采纳并习惯于新法案中的重大变更。建议应制定和部署一项针对该新法案的全行业提高认识计划。原创性/价值-本文提高了建筑业专业人员对废除新的裁决法中的“书面合同”规则可能产生的影响的理解和认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号