首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management >HOW DO HIGH, MEDIUM, AND LOW TECH FIRMS INNOVATE? A SYSTEM OF INNOVATION (SI) APPROACH
【24h】

HOW DO HIGH, MEDIUM, AND LOW TECH FIRMS INNOVATE? A SYSTEM OF INNOVATION (SI) APPROACH

机译:高,中,低技术公司如何创新?创新(SI)方法体系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the past decade, the innovation literature has mainly targeted high-tech (HT) sectors due to their higher return on investment and important role in building new societies and economies. While the HT sector is still of a leading importance, whether medium and low tech (LMT) sectors should be equivalently considered when analyzing long term economic growth, in both leading and catching up economies, is a fundamental question. This paper is our second milestone comparing HT and LMT sectors from an innovation perspective, using a National System of Innovation (NSI) approach. The general aim of this paper is to find the main principles that govern the difference between the two industrial segments (HT and LMT) while controlling for supranational boundaries. In order to measure the effect of NSI, countries are divided into two groups: leading and catching up economies. Our results suggest that, with respect to HT, leading economies can be considered as innovators, while catching up economies are the imitators. Furthermore, HT in leading economies relies on product modularity to outsource various components probably to firms in catching up economies. Catching ups are putting greater emphasis on universities to produce knowledge. In addition, firms in catching up economies benefit from high accessibility to funds in order to grow various industrial sectors, especially LMT. The role of institutions and governments with respect to regulatory policies, intellectual property protections are of high importance for firms in catching up economies, especially in LMT. As a result of those important steps, the various agents in catching up economies have achieved sustainable growth, notably in LMT. In contrast, the same growth is observed for HT for firms in leading economies. Our results suggest that catching up countries are strategizing for this sectoral evolution, renewal, and transformation process for both sectors, but with a stronger emphasis on LMT.
机译:在过去的十年中,创新文献主要针对高科技行业,因为它们具有较高的投资回报率,并且在建设新社会和经济中发挥着重要作用。尽管HT行业仍然处于领先地位,但是在分析领先经济体和追赶经济体的长期经济增长时,是否应同等考虑中低技术(LMT)部门是一个基本问题。本文是我们使用国家创新体系(NSI)方法从创新角度比较HT和LMT部门的第二个里程碑。本文的总体目标是找到在控制超国家边界的同时,控制两个工业部门(HT和LMT)之间差异的主要原则。为了衡量NSI的影响,国家分为两类:领先经济体和追赶经济体。我们的结果表明,就HT而言,领先经济体可以被视为创新者,而追赶经济体是模仿者。此外,领先经济体中的HT依靠产品模块化将各种组件外包给可能赶上经济体的公司。追赶者越来越重视大学来产生知识。此外,赶超经济体的公司得益于资金的高可获得性,以发展各种工业部门,特别是LMT。机构和政府在监管政策,知识产权保护方面的作用对于企业追赶经济特别是在LMT中至关重要。这些重要步骤的结果是,赶上经济的各个机构已实现可持续增长,特别是在LMT。相比之下,领先经济体的企业在HT方面的增长相同。我们的结果表明,追赶国家正在为这两个部门的部门发展,更新和转型过程制定策略,但更加重视LMT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号