首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Exergy Analysis Of Hydrogen Production Plants Based On Biomass Gasification
【24h】

Exergy Analysis Of Hydrogen Production Plants Based On Biomass Gasification

机译:基于生物质气化的制氢厂的火用分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biomass gasification is a promising option for the sustainable production of hydrogen rich gas. Five different commercial or pilot scale gasification systems are considered for the design of a hydrogen production plant that generates almost pure hydrogen. For each of the gasification technique models of two different hydrogen production plants are developed in Cycle-Tempo: one plant with low temperature gas cleaning (LTGC) and the other with high temperature gas cleaning (HTGC). The thermal input of all plants is 10 MW of biomass with the same dry composition. An exergy analysis of all processes has been made. The processes are compared on their thermodynamic performance (hydrogen yield and exergy efficiency). Since the heat recovery is not incorporated in the models, two efficiencies are calculated. The first one is calculated for the case that all residual heat can be applied, the case with ideal heat recovery, and the other is calculated for the case without heat recovery. It is expected that in real systems only a part of the residual heat can be used. Therefore, the actual value will be in between these calculated values. It was found that three processes have almost the same performance: The Battelle gasification process with LTGC, the FICFB gasification process with LTGC, and the Blaue Turm gasification process with HTGC. All systems include further processing of the cleaned gas from biomass gasification into almost pure hydrogen. The calculated exergy efficiencies are, respectively, 50.69%, 45.95%, and 50.52% for the systems without heat recovery. The exergy efficiencies of the systems with heat recovery are, respectively, 62.79%, 64.41%, and 66.31%. The calculated hydrogen yields of the three processes do not differ very much. The hydrogen yield of the Battelle LTGC process appeared to be 0.097 kg (kg_((dry biomass)))~(-1), for the FICFB LTGC process a yield of 0.096 kg (kg_((dry biomass)))~(-1) was found, and for the Blaue Turm HTGC 0.106 kg (kg_((dry biomass)))~(-1). Since the Blaue Turm gasification process is far behind the technologies of the Battelle and FICFB processes it is concluded that further consideration of the Battelle and FICFB processes has to be preferred for the generation of highly pure hydrogen.
机译:生物质气化是可持续生产富氢气体的有前途的选择。考虑使用五个不同的商业或中试规模的气化系统来设计产生几乎纯净氢气的制氢设备。对于每个气化技术模型,都在Cycle-Tempo中开发了两个不同的制氢厂:一个工厂进行低温气体净化(LTGC),另一工厂进行高温气体净化(HTGC)。所有植物的热输入为具有相同干组成的10兆瓦生物质。对所有过程进行了火用分析。比较了这些过程的热力学性能(氢产率和火用效率)。由于模型中未包含热量回收,因此计算了两个效率。第一个是针对所有余热都可以应用的情况,具有理想热量回收的情况,而第二个是针对没有热量回收的情况。可以预期,在实际系统中,只能使用一部分剩余热量。因此,实际值将介于这些计算值之间。发现三种工艺几乎具有相同的性能:采用LTGC的Battelle气化工艺,采用LTGC的FICFB气化工艺和采用HTGC的Blaue Turm气化工艺。所有系统都包括将生物质气化后的清洁气体进一步处理成几乎纯净的氢气。对于没有热回收的系统,计算出的火用效率分别为50.69%,45.95%和50.52%。具有热回收的系统的火用效率分别为62.79%,64.41%和66.31%。这三个过程的氢产率计算值相差不大。 Battelle LTGC工艺的氢气产量似乎为0.097 kg(kg _((干生物质)))〜(-1),对于FICFB LTGC工艺,氢气的产量为0.096 kg(kg _((干生物质)))〜(-发现1),对于Blaue Turm HTGC,为0.106 kg(kg _((干生物质)))〜(-1)。由于Blaue Turm气化工艺远远落后于Battelle和FICFB工艺的技术,因此得出结论,对于生成高纯氢气,必须优先考虑Battelle和FICFB工艺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号