首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Can the addition of hydrogen to natural gas reduce the explosion risk?
【24h】

Can the addition of hydrogen to natural gas reduce the explosion risk?

机译:天然气中添加氢气可以降低爆炸风险吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the main benefits sought by including hydrogen in the alternative fuels mix is emissions reduction - eventually by 100%. However, in the near term, there is a very significant cost differential between fossil fuels and hydrogen. Hythane (a blend of hydrogen and natural gas) can act as a viable next step on the path to an ultimate hydrogen economy as a fuel blend consisting of 8-30% hydrogen in methane can reduce emissions while not requiring significant changes in existing infrastructure. This work seeks to evaluate whether hythane may be safer than both hydrogen and methane under certain conditions. This is due to the fact hythane combines the positive safety properties of hydrogen (strong buoyancy, high diffusivity) and methane (much lower flame speeds and narrower flammability limits as compared to hydrogen). For this purpose, several different mixture compositions (e.g. 8%, 20% and 30% hydrogen) are considered. The evaluation of (a) dispersion characteristics (which are more positive than for methane), (b) combustion characteristics (which are closer to methane than hydrogen), and (c) Combined dispersion + explosion risk is performed. This risk is expected to be comparable to that of pure methane, possibly lower in some situations, and definitely lower than for pure hydrogen. The work is performed using the CFD software FLACS that has been well-validated for safety studies of both natural gas/methane and hydrogen systems. The first part of the work will involve validating the flame speeds and flammability limits predicted by FLACS against values available in literature. The next part of the work involves validating the overpressures predicted by the CFD tool for combustion of premixed mixtures of methane and hydrogen with air against available experimental data. In the end, practical systems such as vehicular tunnels, garages, etc. is used to demonstrate positive safety benefits of hythane with comparisons to similar simulations for both hydrogen and methane.
机译:通过在替代燃料混合物中包含氢而寻求的主要好处之一是减少排放-最终减少100%。但是,在短期内,化石燃料和氢气之间的成本差异非常大。甲烷(氢和天然气的混合物)可以作为通往最终氢经济的可行的下一步,因为由8-30%的甲烷中的甲烷组成的燃料混合物可以减少排放,而无需对现有基础设施进行重大改动。这项工作旨在评估在某些条件下,ane烷是否比氢和甲烷都更安全。这是因为,事实是,结合了氢(强浮力,高扩散性)和甲烷(与氢相比,更低的火焰速度和更窄的可燃性极限)的积极安全特性。为此,考虑了几种不同的混合物组成(例如8%,20%和30%的氢)。进行(a)弥散特性(比甲烷更积极),(b)燃烧特性(比氢气更接近甲烷)和(c)混合弥散+爆炸风险的评估。预计该风险与纯甲烷相当,在某些情况下可能更低,并且绝对低于纯氢气。这项工作是使用CFD软件FLACS进行的,该软件已经过充分验证,可用于天然气/甲烷和氢气系统的安全性研究。工作的第一部分将涉及对照文献中可用的值来验证FLACS预测的火焰速度和可燃性极限。工作的下一部分涉及根据可用的实验数据验证CFD工具预测的甲烷和氢气与空气的预混合混合物燃烧的超压。最后,通过与诸如氢气和甲烷的类似模拟进行比较,使用了诸如车辆隧道,车库等实用系统来证明乙烷的积极安全益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号