首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Comparison of two different catalyst preparation methods for graphene nanoplatelets supported platinum catalysts
【24h】

Comparison of two different catalyst preparation methods for graphene nanoplatelets supported platinum catalysts

机译:石墨烯纳米片载铂催化剂的两种不同催化剂制备方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we compared two facile and effective approaches which are supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO(2)) deposition and microwave irradiation methods to synthesize Pt nanoparticles uniformly dispersed on graphene nanoplatelets (G) having 750 m(2)/g surface area as the support material. The prepared catalysts were characterized by using XRD, TGA, TEM, CV and PEM fuel cell performance tests. Microwave irradiation (Pt/G1) and scCO(2) deposition (Pt/G2) methods resulted in the particle sizes of 3.1-3.4 nm and 1.5-1.6 nm, respectively. Higher electrochemically active surface area and PEM fuel cell performance were obtained for the Pt/G2 catalyst. An accelerated aging test, carbon corrosion, is also applied to the catalysts and Tafel slope losses were determined. Pt/G1 catalyst resulted in 50 mV Tafel slope loss whereas no significant loss was observed for Pt/G2 catalyst after carbon corrosion test. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,我们比较了两种简便有效的方法,即超临界二氧化碳(scCO(2))沉积和微波辐射方法来合成均匀分散在具有750 m(2)/ g表面积的石墨烯纳米片(G)上的Pt纳米颗粒,支撑材料。通过XRD,TGA,TEM,CV和PEM燃料电池性能测试对制备的催化剂进行了表征。微波辐射(Pt / G1)和scCO(2)沉积(Pt / G2)方法分别产生了3.1-3.4 nm和1.5-1.6 nm的粒径。对于Pt / G2催化剂,获得了更高的电化学活性表面积和PEM燃料电池性能。还对催化剂进行了加速老化试验,即碳腐蚀,并确定了Tafel斜率损失。 Pt / G1催化剂导致50 mV Tafel斜率损失,而碳腐蚀试验后未观察到Pt / G2催化剂的明显损失。 (C)2016氢能出版物有限公司。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号