首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Dynamic simulation of different transport options of renewable hydrogen to a refinery in a coupled energy system approach
【24h】

Dynamic simulation of different transport options of renewable hydrogen to a refinery in a coupled energy system approach

机译:用耦合能源系统方法动态模拟可再生氢到炼油厂的不同运输方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Three alternative transport options for hydrogen generated from excess renewable power to a refinery of different scales are compared to the reference case by means of hydrogen production cost, overall efficiency, and CO2 emissions. The hydrogen is transported by a) the natural gas grid and reclaimed by the existing steam reformer, b) an own pipeline and c) hydrogen trailers. The analysis is applied to the city of Hamburg, Germany, for two scenarios of installed renewable energy capacities. The annual course of excess renewable power is modeled in a coupled system approach and the replaceable hydrogen mass flow rate is determined using measurement data from an existing refinery. Dynamic simulations are performed using an open-source Modelica (R) library. It is found that in all three alternative hydrogen supply chains CO2 emissions can be reduced and costs are increased compared to the reference case. Transporting hydrogen via the natural gas grid is the least efficient but achieves the highest emission reduction and is the most economical alternative for small to medium amounts of hydrogen. Using a hydrogen pipeline is the most efficient option and slightly cheaper for large amounts than employing the natural gas grid. Transporting hydrogen by trailers is not economical for single consumers and realizes the lowest CO2 reductions. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.
机译:通过制氢成本,总体效率和CO2排放,将过量可再生能源产生的氢气的三种替代运输方式运往不同规模的炼油厂与参考案例。氢通过a)天然气网格运输,并通过现有的蒸汽重整器进行回收,b)自己的管道和c)氢气拖车。该分析适用于德国汉堡市的两种可再生能源装机容量方案。使用耦合系统方法对年度可再生能源过剩过程进行建模,并使用来自现有炼油厂的测量数据确定可替代氢气质量流量。动态模拟是使用开源Modelica(R)库执行的。发现与参考情况相比,在所有三个替代氢供应链中,可以减少CO2排放并增加成本。通过天然气网格运输氢气效率最低,但减排量最高,对于中小量氢气是最经济的选择。使用氢气管道是最有效的选择,并且与使用天然气网格相比,使用氢气管道的大量运输成本稍微便宜一些。对于单个用户而言,通过拖车运输氢气并不经济,并且二氧化碳排放量最低。 (C)2018作者。由Elsevier Ltd代表Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号