首页> 外文期刊>International journal of human-computer interaction >Evaluation of Text Entry Methods for Interactive Digital Television Applications with Devices Alternative to Conventional Remote Controls
【24h】

Evaluation of Text Entry Methods for Interactive Digital Television Applications with Devices Alternative to Conventional Remote Controls

机译:交互式数字电视应用中使用文本遥控器替代传统遥控器的文本输入方法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The popularity of Interactive Digital Television (IDTV) applications has grown in recent years, playing a significant role in today's society. This new type of television allows users to access interactive applications in order to look for information, for communication or educational purposes, or just for fun. Most of these applications require text entry and many users expect a user experience similar to that of computers. Although the most common device to interact with television is the conventional remote control, other devices available on the market may be used in this context. Thus, in this article we aim to evaluate and compare different text input methods for IDTV applications using devices alternative to conventional remote controls. We have carried out an empirical study with 52 participants. We analyze entry speeds, error rates, and subjective impressions for six different entry methods, taking into account the particular characteristics of the users. As devices we have used a full-sized keyboard, a palm-sized keyboard, a gyroscopic remote point-select, and a modified touchpad. The fastest method is the standard keyboard, but in an IDTV context many users report discomfort and problems under low lighting conditions. Also, error rates are considerably higher with both keyboards when modifier keys need to be used. The results obtained with the gyroscopic remote and the touchpad are similar. Nevertheless, while users complain about fatigue problems with the former, their feedback about the latter is very positive. We have also observed that age is a major factor affecting the performance of the users. We expect our results to contribute to the design of new text entry methods for IDTV.
机译:近年来,交互式数字电视(IDTV)应用程序的普及程度不断提高,在当今社会中发挥着重要作用。这种新型的电视使用户可以访问交互式应用程序,以查找信息,进行交流或教育目的或只是为了娱乐。这些应用程序中的大多数都需要输入文本,许多用户希望获得与计算机相似的用户体验。尽管与电视交互的最常见设备是常规遥控器,但是在这种情况下,可以使用市场上其他可用的设备。因此,在本文中,我们旨在使用替代传统遥控器的设备评估和比较IDTV应用程序的不同文本输入方法。我们进行了有52名参与者的实证研究。我们会考虑用户的特定特征,分析六种不同输入方法的输入速度,错误率和主观印象。作为设备,我们使用了全尺寸键盘,掌上型键盘,陀螺仪远程点选择和改进的触摸板。最快的方法是标准键盘,但是在IDTV环境下,许多用户报告在光线不足的情况下感到不适和问题。另外,当需要使用修饰键时,两个键盘的错误率都很高。用陀螺仪遥控器和触摸板获得的结果相似。然而,尽管用户抱怨前者的疲劳问题,但他们对后者的反馈却非常积极。我们还观察到年龄是影响用户表现的主要因素。我们希望我们的结果将有助于IDTV的新文本输入方法的设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号