首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer >Assessing advantages and disadvantages of macro- and micro-channel flow boiling for high-heat-flux thermal management using computational and theoretical/empirical methods
【24h】

Assessing advantages and disadvantages of macro- and micro-channel flow boiling for high-heat-flux thermal management using computational and theoretical/empirical methods

机译:使用计算和理论/经验方法评估高热通量热管理宏观和微通道流沸腾的优缺点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines the advantages and disadvantages of micro- and macro-channel flow boiling for high-heat-flux cooling applications using both computational and theoretical/empirical methods. The computational simulations are conducted in ANSYS FLUENT using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method along with the Lee phase change model, and accounting for both shear lift force and conjugate heat transfer along the channel walls. Computational results for both channel sizes are compared with theoretical/empirical results obtained using the Homogeneous Equilibrium Model (HEM) and Separated Flow Model (SFM), and both HEM and the Homogenous Frozen Model (HFM) are used to assess the potential for two-phase choking. The computational results show bubbles in micro-channels are highly confined and tend to grow longer in the flow direction. The two methods show good agreement in predicting wall temperatures. Overall, micro-channel heat sinks are shown to fare much better than macro-channels in terms of heat transfer performance, evidenced by both significantly higher heat transfer coefficients and lower wall temperatures, but this comes at the cost of significantly higher pressure drop and pumping power requirements. It is also shown micro-channels are prone to choking due to high two-phase Mach number.
机译:本研究研究了使用计算和理论/经验方法的高热通量冷却应用的微型和宏观通道流沸腾的优缺点。计算模拟在使用流体(VOF)方法以及LEE相变模型的ansys流畅的ansys中进行,并且涉及沿沟道壁的剪切力力和缀合物热传递。将两个通道大小的计算结果与使用均匀平衡模型(下摆)和分离的流动模型(SFM)获得的理论/经验结果进行比较,并且均下摆和均匀的冷冻模型(HFM)用于评估两个 - 相窒息。计算结果显示微通道中的气泡是高度限制的并且在流动方向上趋于生长更长。这两种方法在预测墙面温度方面表现出良好的一致性。总体而言,在传热性能方面,微通道散热器显示出比宏观通道更好的票价,通过显着更高的传热系数和更低的壁温度来证明,这是较高的压力下降和泵送的成本电源要求。由于高两相马赫数,它也显示出微通道容易窒息。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer》 |2021年第4期|120787.1-120787.25|共25页
  • 作者单位

    Purdue University Boiling and Two-Phase Flow Laboratory (PU-BTPFL) School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University 585 Purdue Mall West Lafayette IN 47907 USA;

    School of Energy & Environment Southeast University Nanjing Jiangsu PR China;

    School of Energy & Environment Southeast University Nanjing Jiangsu PR China;

    Purdue University Boiling and Two-Phase Flow Laboratory (PU-BTPFL) School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University 585 Purdue Mall West Lafayette IN 47907 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    flow boiling; micro-channel; macro-channel; choking; CFD; two-phase heat sinks;

    机译:流沸腾;微通道;宏观通道;窒息;CFD;两相散热器;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号