首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow >Comparison of zonal RANS and LES for a non-isothermal ribbed channel flow
【24h】

Comparison of zonal RANS and LES for a non-isothermal ribbed channel flow

机译:非等温肋状通道流的区域RANS和LES的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerical simulations for a non-isothermal ribbed channel flow are made. Due to the relatively low Reynolds number (Re = 14,200, based on the channel height), the results have relevance to higher Reynolds number electronics cooling systems. Through considering a k-l based zonal large Eddy simulation (ZLES) method and the S-A based detached Eddy simulation (DES) approach, the predictive accuracy of hybrid methods is assessed. This is assisted through comparisons with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model results and also measurements. The RANS models used are the zonal k-l/EASM (explicit algebraic stress model) and k-l/cubic (nonlinear cubic). The k-lmodelling in these is just used near walls. Comparison reveals that both ZLES and DES are capable of capturing complex unsteady flow features associated with flow separation and reattachment. In general, for the present case, ZLES and DES perform similarly and are in better agreement with measurements than results from the zonal RANS. ZLES and DES heat transfer predictions are encouraging, the model sensitivity of results displayed when using RANS approaches being much less marked.
机译:进行了非等温肋状通道水流的数值模拟。由于雷诺数相对较低(基于通道高度,Re = 14,200),因此结果与雷诺数较高的电子冷却系统有关。通过考虑基于k-1的区域大涡模拟(ZLES)方法和基于S-A的分离涡模拟(DES)方法,评估了混合方法的预测准确性。通过与雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)模型结果以及测量结果进行比较,可以辅助此操作。使用的RANS模型是纬向k-1 / EASM(显式代数应力模型)和k-1 /三次方(非线性三次方)。其中的k模型仅用于墙附近。比较表明,ZLES和DES都能够捕获与流分离和重新连接有关的复杂的非稳定流特征。通常,就当前情况而言,ZLES和DES的性能相似,并且与区域RANS的结果相比,与测量结果更加吻合。 ZLES和DES的传热预测令人鼓舞,使用RANS方法显示的结果对模型的敏感性要低得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号