首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Forensic Mental Health >Assessing Risk for Violent and General Recidivism: A Study of the HCR-20 and the PCL-R with a Non-Clinical Sample of Portuguese Offenders
【24h】

Assessing Risk for Violent and General Recidivism: A Study of the HCR-20 and the PCL-R with a Non-Clinical Sample of Portuguese Offenders

机译:评估暴力和再犯的风险:对HCR-20和PCL-R的研究,以及葡萄牙罪犯的非临床样本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study intended to contribute to the development of risk assessment research and practice in Portugal, while addressing less explored areas of research in the international literature. We sought to replicate and extend the validity of the HCR-20 and the PCL-R, and their components, in a correctional community setting, with a sample of 158 non-mentally disordered Portuguese offenders, regarding both violent and nonviolent recidivism. The predictive, convergent and incremental validity of the HCR-20 and the PCL-R were prospectively tested in relation to general, violent and nonviolent recidivism. Furthermore, the performance of the structured professional judgment (SPJ) was compared to the pure actuarial use of the HCR-20. Both the HCR-20 and the PCL-R showed good predictive validity, although the HCR-20 tended to outperform the PCL-R for general, violent and nonviolent recidivism, adding significant incremental validity to predictions made solely with the PCL-R. High coefficients for the prediction of general and nonviolent recidivism showed that the HCR-20 and the PCL-R can be valid risk measures for outcome other than violence and that they can be useful in nonclinical settings. Results also provided support for the validity and utility of the SPJ method, especially for the assessment of violent outcomes. Our findings showed that internationally disseminated assessment tools, such as the HCR-20 and the PCL-R, can be used with Portuguese offenders with valid and efficient results.View full textDownload full textKeywordsHCR-20, PCL-R, violent and nonviolent recidivism, non-mentally disordered offenders, structured professional judgmentRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.577290
机译:本研究旨在促进葡萄牙风险评估研究和实践的发展,同时解决国际文献中研究较少的领域。我们试图通过在158个非精神错乱的葡萄牙罪犯中对暴力和非暴力累犯行为进行抽样,在惩教社区中复制并扩展HCR-20和PCL-R及其组成部分的有效性。前瞻性测试了HCR-20和PCL-R在一般,暴力和非暴力累犯中的预测,收敛和递增有效性。此外,将结构化专业判断(SPJ)的性能与HCR-20的纯精算使用进行了比较。 HCR-20和PCL-R均显示出良好的预测效度,尽管HCR-20在一般,暴力和非暴力累犯中的表现往往优于PCL-R,为仅使用PCL-R进行的预测增加了显着的递增效度。预测一般和非暴力再犯的高系数表明,HCR-20和PCL-R可以作为对暴力以外的其他结局有效的风险衡量指标,它们在非临床环境中很有用。结果也为SPJ方法的有效性和实用性提供了支持,尤其是对于暴力结果的评估。我们的调查结果表明,HCR-20和PCL-R等国际知名的评估工具可以与葡萄牙罪犯一起使用,并获得有效和有效的结果。查看全文下载全文关键词非精神错乱的犯罪者,结构化的专业判断相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid: “ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.577290

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号