首页> 外文期刊>International journal of environmental analytical chemistry >Comparison of portable devices for sub-ambient concentration measurements of methane (CH_4) and nitrous oxide (N_2O) in soil research
【24h】

Comparison of portable devices for sub-ambient concentration measurements of methane (CH_4) and nitrous oxide (N_2O) in soil research

机译:用于土壤研究中甲烷(CH_4)和一氧化二氮(N_2O)的亚环境浓度测量的便携式设备的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Production and consumption of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) in soils have a strong influence on global greenhouse gases (GHG) budgets. Therefore, it is crucial to precisely measure GHG fluxes at the soil-atmosphere interface. In upland soils, CH4 and N2O can be consumed by microbiological processes, and the respective concentrations can be lower than in the atmosphere, demanding highly sensitive gas analysing systems. Traditionally, soil air is sampled in vials and analysed in the laboratory by gas chromatography (GC). During the last decade, different technologies have been developed that allowed to build portable gas analysers that are able to measure sub-ambient gas concentration directly in the field. Here, we compared sub-ambient to ambient CH4 and N2O concentration values from four portable devices using different measurement technologies (a portable GHG analyser based on laser absorption spectroscopy [LAS], two portable Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy [FTIR] devices and a field gas analyser using photoacoustic spectroscopy [PAS]) to traditional GC analysis in the laboratory (a GC system equipped with a flame ionisation detector [GC-FID] and an electron capture detector [GC-ECD]). The accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy measurements are strongly influenced by the water vapour content and non-target gases in the sampling air. We used an advanced set-up for a widely used PAS analyser enabling N2O measurements at sub-ambient concentrations with similar precision and accuracy as the GC-ECD system. Measurements of CH4 and N2O by FTIR and LAS devices were in good agreement with the GC systems. We conclude that the portable devices are suitable for studies of GHG fluxes in the field. Thanks to their universal and portable character, LAS, PAS and FTIR devices represent useful alternatives to currently used technologies for field studies.
机译:土壤中甲烷(CH4)和一氧化二氮(N2O)的生产和消费对全球温室气体(GHG)预算有很大影响。因此,精确测量土壤-大气界面处的温室气体通量至关重要。在陆地土壤中,CH4和N2O可以通过微生物过程消耗,其各自的浓度可能低于大气中的浓度,因此需要高度灵敏的气体分析系统。传统上,将土壤空气采样到小瓶中,然后在实验室中通过气相色谱仪(GC)进行分析。在过去的十年中,已经开发出了各种技术,这些技术允许构建便携式气体分析仪,这些分析仪能够直接在现场测量低于环境的气体浓度。在这里,我们比较了四种使用不同测量技术的便携式设备(基于激光吸收光谱仪[LAS]的便携式温室气体分析仪,两个便携式傅里叶变换红外光谱仪[FTIR]和野外气体)在环境温度下的CH4和N2O浓度值。分析仪使用光声光谱法(PAS)进行实验室中的传统GC分析(配备火焰离子化检测器[GC-FID]和电子捕获检测器[GC-ECD]的GC系统)。水声含量和采样空气中的非目标气体会严重影响光声光谱测量的准确性和精确度。我们为广泛使用的PAS分析仪使用了高级设置,可在低于环境浓度的条件下以与GC-ECD系统相似的精度和准确度进行N2O测量。 FTIR和LAS装置对CH4和N2O的测量与GC系统非常吻合。我们得出结论,便携式设备适用于该领域的温室气体通量研究。由于其通用性和便携性,LAS,PAS和FTIR设备代表了当前用于现场研究的技术的有用替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号