...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Small Business >Is there any difference between 'hourly wage rate' vs. 'piece wage rate'
【24h】

Is there any difference between 'hourly wage rate' vs. 'piece wage rate'

机译:“小时工资率”与“计件工资率”之间有什么区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper addresses a crucial question as to whether there is any difference between 'hourly-wage' rate and 'piece-wage' rate. In this paper, this issue is subjected to empirical test by looking at evidence from the Fiji garment industry. The data and analysis shows that there is no difference and in fact, 'hourly-wage' rate is a disguised form of 'piece-wage' rate. The empirical evidence from the Fiji garment industry debunks the myth that there is a major difference between 'hourly wage' rate and 'piece-wage' rate. A 'bloody taylorist' punitive labour regime exists in all the three garment supply chains in Fiji. A domestic punitive labour regime existed in the Fiji garment industry before the arrival of foreign Australian, New Zealand, and Chinese garment firms. When the Australian and New Zealand garment firms relocated to Fiji they adopted and continued the 'going' local punitive labour regime in their firms. They had no choice but were forced by competition to go along with this punitive labour regime. The foreign Chinese garment firms made the labour regime even worse as they brought with them the punitive Chinese labour regime from mainland Chinese and implemented the punitive Chinese labour regime in Fiji.
机译:本文提出了一个关键问题,即“小时工资”率和“计件工资”率之间是否存在差异。本文通过考察斐济制衣业的证据对这一问题进行了实证检验。数据和分析表明没有差别,实际上,“小时工资”率是“计件工资”率的变相形式。斐济制衣业的经验证据揭穿了一个神话,即“小时工资”率和“计件工资”率之间存在重大差异。斐济的所有三个服装供应链都存在“血腥的泰勒主义者”惩罚性劳工制度。在外国澳大利亚人,新西兰人和中国服装公司到来之前,斐济制衣业存在国内惩罚性劳工制度。当澳大利亚和新西兰的服装公司迁往斐济时,他们采用并继续了他们公司的“持续性”当地惩罚性劳工制度。他们别无选择,只好在竞争中被迫接受惩罚性劳工制度。外国华人制衣公司带来了来自中国大陆的惩罚性中国劳工制度,并在斐济实行了惩罚性中国劳工制度,使劳工制度更加恶化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号