首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Predicting Academic Success and Creative Ability in Freshman Chemical Engineering Students: A Learning Styles Perspective
【24h】

Predicting Academic Success and Creative Ability in Freshman Chemical Engineering Students: A Learning Styles Perspective

机译:预测新生化学工程专业学生的学术成功和创造能力:一种学习风格的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of the paper is to investigate the predictive validity of learning styles on academic achievement and creativity gain. For this purpose, freshman chemical engineering students from Cracow University of Technology were recruited (n = 100). An experimental research design was used in this study where 49 freshman students were enrolled in a two-day creativity training course while 51 students were enrolled in traditional Humanities course. To measure creative ability the Test of Creative Thinking-Drawing Production was used as pre- and post test. Students also completed a dynamic learning style inventory that measured learning orientation, processing information, thinking, perceiving information, physical and time learning preferences, sociological, emotional and environmental preferences of learning. Student performance was measured with grade point average (GPA) and normalized creativity gain (CG). Results show that 74% of the variance in GPA and 63% of the variance in CG can be explained by learning style predictors. Global and cluster thinking are the best positive correlated predictors in GPA while a need for authority figure and intuitive perceiving information are the best negative correlated predictors in GPA. Nonconformist and self-motivation are the best positive predictors in CG while a need for structure and sequential thinking are the best negative correlated predictors in CG. The practical implications are that engineering universities should collect learning style data on students at the outset and then help students accordingly to be more successful and creative. Highly concrete sequential learners and visual theorist who are organized and self-motivated might potentially be offered more challenging honours programs with corresponding special commendations on their projects and thesis, whereas students who are more intuitive, other-motivated would receive more structure through student study groups, frequent deadlines, shorter assignments, and clearly defined learning goals for passing examinations. Active global learners need more space for acting, demanding training objectives, and more nonconventional learning objects for exploiting their creative ability.
机译:本文的目的是研究学习方式对学业成就和创造力的预测有效性。为此,招募了来自克拉科夫工业大学的新生化学工程专业的学生(n = 100)。本研究采用实验研究设计,其中49名新生参加了为期两天的创造力培训课程,而51名学生则参加了传统人文课程。为了衡量创新能力,将“创造性思维绘图生产测试”用作前后测试。学生还完成了一个动态的学习风格清单,该清单测量了学习方向,处理信息,思维,感知信息,身体和时间学习偏好,学习的社会学,情感和环境偏好。用平均绩点(GPA)和归一化创造力(CG)衡量学生的表现。结果表明,学习风格预测变量可以解释GPA中74%的差异和CG中63%的差异。全局思维和集群思维是GPA中最好的正相关预测因子,而对权威人物和直观感知信息的需求是GPA中最好的负相关预测因子。不服从和自我激励是CG中最好的积极预测因素,而对结构和顺序思维的需求是CG中最好的消极相关预测因素。实际的含义是,工科大学应从一开始就收集学生的学习风格数据,然后相应地帮助学生获得更大的成功和创造力。组织和自我激励的高度具体的顺序学习者和视觉理论家可能会获得更具挑战性的荣誉课程,并在其项目和论文上获得相应的特殊表彰,而更直观,其他动机的学生将通过学生学习小组获得更多结构,频繁的截止日期,较短的作业以及明确定义的通过考试的学习目标。积极的全球学习者需要更多的行动空间,要求严格的培训目标,以及更多的非常规学习对象才能发挥其创造力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号