...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems >A hybrid approach based on IGDT-MPSO method for optimal bidding strategy of price-taker generation station in day-ahead electricity market
【24h】

A hybrid approach based on IGDT-MPSO method for optimal bidding strategy of price-taker generation station in day-ahead electricity market

机译:基于IGDT-MPSO的混合方法在日前电力市场中价格接受发电站的最优竞价策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper considers a price-taker generation station producer that participates in a day-ahead market. The producer behaves as a price-taker participant in the day-ahead electricity market. In electricity market, the price-taker producer could develop bidding strategies to maximize own profits. While making optimal bidding strategy, the market price uncertainty needs to be considered as they have direct impact on the expected profit and bidding curves. In this paper, a hybrid approach based on information gap decision theory (IGDT) and modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO) is used to develop the optimal bidding strategy. Information gap decision theory is used to model the optimal bidding strategy problem. It assesses the robustness/opportunity of optimal bidding strategy in the face of the market price uncertainty while price-taker producer considers whether a decision risk-averse or risk-taking. The optimization problems to delivering IGDT approach are solved using MPSO. It is shown that risk-averse or risk-taking decisions might affect the expected profit and bidding curve to day-ahead electricity market. The IGDT-MPSO method is illustrated through a case study and compared to IGDT-MINLP method. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文考虑了参与日前市场的价格接受发电站生产商。生产者在日间电力市场中扮演价格接受者的角色。在电力市场中,价格接受者可以制定竞价策略以最大化自身利润。在制定最佳出价策略时,需要考虑市场价格的不确定性,因为它们会直接影响预期利润和出价曲线。本文采用基于信息缺口决策理论(IGDT)和改进的粒子群优化算法(MPSO)的混合方法来开发最优投标策略。信息缺口决策理论被用来模拟最优投标策略问题。它会在面对市场价格不确定性时评估最佳竞标策略的稳健性/机会,而价格接受者则要考虑是避免规避风险还是承担风险。使用MPSO解决了传递IGDT方法的优化问题。结果表明,规避风险或承担风险的决策可能会影响到日前电力市场的预期利润和投标曲线。通过案例研究说明了IGDT-MPSO方法,并将其与IGDT-MINLP方法进行了比较。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号