首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems >Reserve procurement and flexibility services in power systems with high renewable capacity: Effects of integration on different market designs
【24h】

Reserve procurement and flexibility services in power systems with high renewable capacity: Effects of integration on different market designs

机译:具有高可再生能力的电力系统中的储备采购和灵活性服务:集成对不同市场设计的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates different reserve issues inspired by the European situation, focusing on both the moment when reserves are procured and the degree of coordination among Transmission System Operators (TSOs) in that procurement. We present three scheduling models formulated as stochastic programs that represent the day-ahead energy market, the reserve procurement, and the real-time balancing market in a renewable-dominated power system. Two of the proposed models are inspired by reserve procurement mechanisms currently applied in Europe, where reserves are committed either before (Model 1) or after (Model 2) the clearing of the day-ahead energy market. Then, we use as benchmark a third model in which energy and reserve capacity are co-optimized (Model 3). In all models, we consider the procurement of both conventional and upward/downward reserves. We also assess the impact of these organizations on market participants' remuneration and test the impact of cross-border constraints as those applying in the European power system. The case study is based on the IEEE 24-node RTS, considering the uncertainty in renewable power production and demand. Our results show that Model 1 is the least efficient market design as it leads to a misallocation of the available capacity, while Model 2 becomes as efficient as Model 3 when the TSOs procure reserve in a coordinated way. Finally, a coordinated procurement of reserves reduces the system operating costs in all models.
机译:本文研究了受欧洲形势影响的各种储备问题,着眼于采购储备的时刻和该采购中的传输系统运营商(TSO)之间的协调程度。我们提出了三种调度模型,这些模型被表述为随机程序,它们代表了可再生能源为主的电力系统中的日前能源市场,储备采购和实时平衡市场。其中两个提议的模型是受欧洲当前采用的储备采购机制的启发而开发的,在该机制中,储备是在清理日前能源市场之前(模型1)或之后(模型2)承诺的。然后,我们使用第三个模型作为基准,在该模型中,能量和备用容量得到了共同优化(模型3)。在所有模型中,我们都考虑采购常规储备和向上/向下储备。我们还评估了这些组织对市场参与者薪酬的影响,并测试了在欧洲电力系统中应用的跨境限制的影响。该案例研究基于IEEE 24节点RTS,考虑了可再生能源生产和需求的不确定性。我们的结果表明,模型1是效率最低的市场设计,因为它会导致可用容量的分配不当,而模型2在TSO以协调方式获取储备时变得与模型3一样有效。最后,协调采购储备金可降低所有型号的系统运营成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号