...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of economic theory >Sequential formation of alliances in survival contests
【24h】

Sequential formation of alliances in survival contests

机译:生存竞赛中联盟的顺序形成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider a sequential formation of alliances a la Bloch (1996) and Okada (1996), followed by a two-stage contest in which alliances first compete with each other, and then the members in the winning alliance compete again for an indivisible prize. In contrast to Konishi and Pan (2019a), which adopted an open-membership game as the alliance formation process, alliances are allowed to limit their memberships (excludable alliances). We show that if members' efforts are strongly complementary to each other, there will be exactly two asymmetric alliances: the larger alliance is formed first and then the remaining players form the smaller one. This result contrasts with the one under open membership, where moderate complementarity is necessary to support a two-alliance structure. It is also in stark contrast with Bloch, Sanchez-Pages, and Soubeyran (2006), which shows that a grand coalition is formed in the same game if the prize is divisible and a binding contract can be used to avoid further conflicts after an alliance wins the prize.
机译:我们认为联盟的先后顺序是la Bloch(1996)和Okada(1996),然后是一个分为两个阶段的竞赛,联盟首先相互竞争,然后获胜联盟的成员再次竞争不可分割的奖金。与Konishi和Pan(2019a)采用开放会员制游戏作为联盟形成过程相反,联盟被允许限制其成员资格(排他性联盟)。我们表明,如果成员的努力相互补充,那么就会有两个完全不对称的联盟:首先形成较大的联盟,然后剩下的参与者形成较小的联盟。这一结果与开放成员制下的结果形成对比,开放成员制下需要适度的互补性来支持两个联盟的结构。这也与布洛赫(Bloch),桑切斯·佩奇(Sanchez-Pages)和苏贝兰(Soubyran)(2006)形成鲜明对比,后者表明,如果奖金是可分割的,并且同一个游戏可以形成一个大联盟,并且可以使用有约束力的合同来避免结盟后的进一步冲突。获奖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号