...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Bank Marketing >Subjective and objective financial literacy, opinion leadership, and the use of retail banking services
【24h】

Subjective and objective financial literacy, opinion leadership, and the use of retail banking services

机译:主观和客观的金融知识,舆论领导力以及零售银行服务的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposenThe purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between consumers subjective and objective financial literacy (OFL) the necessary knowledge and skills to make effective personal financial decisions and their effects on opinion leadership and the use of retail financial services.nDesign/methodology/approachnIn total, 486 US participants were surveyed. The demographical profile of the sample roughly resembled that of the USA population.nFindingsnOn average, consumers with moderate levels of OFL report lower subjective financial literacy (SFL) compared to those with low or high levels of OFL. Moreover, while SFL and opinion leadership are positively correlated, consumers with moderate levels of OFL reported lower opinion leadership compared to those with high or low levels of OFL. The paper introduces financial literacy miscalibration as the discrepancy between consumers objective and SFL. Financially illiterate respondents who perceived themselves as financially knowledgeable reported high opinion leadership. Finally, a greater percentage of financially literate consumers reported owning checking and savings accounts, using online and mobile banking for diverse purposes, and making fewer phone calls to customer services, compared to others.nResearch limitations/implicationsnThe paper integrates literature from financial literacy, consumer knowledge, and opinion leadership to explain these findings and to further enhance our theoretical and empirical understanding of objective vs SFL.nPractical implicationsnThe discrepancies between objective and SFL may significantly influence consumers financial decisions and the degree to which they expose themselves to the pertinent risks. The paper discusses implications for public policy makers as well as marketing managers and researchers.nOriginality/valuenThe study is the first to empirically explore the research questions following the conceptual development.
机译:目的n本文的目的是探讨消费者主观和客观的金融知识(OFL)之间的关系,以进行有效的个人财务决策所需的知识和技能,以及其对意见领袖和零售金融服务的使用的影响。n设计/方法/方法总共对486位美国参与者进行了调查。样本的人口统计学特征大致与美国人口相似。n调查结果n平均而言,与OFL较低或较高的人群相比,OFL中等水平的消费者的主观金融素养(SFL)较低。此外,尽管SFL和意见领导力呈正相关,但相对于OFL较高或较低的消费者,OFL水平中等的消费者报告的意见领导力较低。本文介绍了金融素养的错误校准是消费者目标与SFL之间的差异。认为自己具备财务知识的财务文盲受访者表示了很高的领导力。最后,与其他人相比,有更多金融知识消费者报告拥有支票和储蓄帐户,使用在线和移动银行进行多种用途,并且打给客户服务的电话更少。n研究局限/意义n本文将金融知识,消费者的文献进行了整合知识和意见领袖来解释这些发现,并进一步增强我们对客观和SFL的理论和经验理解。n实际意义n客观和SFL之间的差异可能会显着影响消费者的财务决策以及他们暴露于相关风险的程度。本文讨论了对公共政策制定者以及市场营销经理和研究人员的意义。原创性/价值这项研究是继概念发展之后第一个以经验方式探索研究问题的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号