首页> 外文期刊>The International History Review >The Meanings of Conversion: Treaty Law, State Knowledge, and Religious Identity among Russian Captives in the Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Empire
【24h】

The Meanings of Conversion: Treaty Law, State Knowledge, and Religious Identity among Russian Captives in the Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Empire

机译:Conversion依的意义:条约法,国家知识和十八世纪奥斯曼帝国俄国俘虏之间的宗教认同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the role of religious conversion in the rules worked out, on paper and in practice, between the Ottoman and Russian empires for the return of captives following their frequent eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century conflicts. The author shows that the abolition of ransom led the Ottoman state to take the central role in the liberation of captives in private hands in its territories. For cultural and fiscal reasons, this required the state to define a test for captives’ conversion to Islam, a matter which had previously been communally and religiously defined. The author traces the changing conversion tests used, and the ways they were manipulated by both captors and captives for their own ends, arguing that the legal definition of conversion undermined official trust, and perhaps community trust more broadly, in conversion's social role. This discussion sheds light on the connections between state knowledge, centralisation, and identity, while suggesting that Ottoman state intervention in matters of slavery and conversion, which has previously been seen as a product of the consciously reforming nineteenth-century Tanzimat, emerged earlier as a pragmatic result of Ottoman participation in the international arena.View full textDownload full textKeywordsOttoman Empire, prisoners of war, conversion, Imperial Russia, international lawRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2012.675230
机译:本文研究了宗教conversion依在纸上和实践中制定的规则中的作用,这些规则是在奥斯曼帝国和俄国帝国之间频繁发生18世纪和19世纪初冲突后俘虏返回的。作者表明,取消赎金使奥斯曼帝国在解放其领土上的私人手中的俘虏中发挥了核心作用。出于文化和财政方面的原因,这要求国家为俘虏向伊斯兰教的conversion依定义一个测试,此事以前在社区和宗教上已被定义。作者追踪了所使用的不断变化的转换测试,以及绑架者和俘虏为自己目的而进行操纵的方式,认为转换的法律定义削弱了官方对转换的社会角色的信任,甚至破坏了社区的广泛信任。这次讨论揭示了国家知识,中央集权和身份之间的联系,同时表明奥斯曼帝国对奴隶制和conversion依事务的干预,以前曾被视为有意识地改革十九世纪的坦齐玛特的产物,而在较早的时期就出现了。奥斯曼帝国参与国际舞台的务实结果。查看全文下载全文关键词奥斯曼帝国,战俘,conversion依,帝国俄罗斯,国际法相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter, technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2012.675230

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号