首页> 外文期刊>International energy law review >The 'Brexit' Debate and the Energy Sector; embracing freedom or a reckless leap in the dark?
【24h】

The 'Brexit' Debate and the Energy Sector; embracing freedom or a reckless leap in the dark?

机译:“脱欧”辩论与能源部门;拥抱自由还是在黑暗中鲁ck飞跃?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As 23 June, the date of the UK referendum on British membership of the EU, approaches, the debate rages more fiercely than ever. Passions have become so heated that even the Archbishop of Canterbury thought it advisable to step in a short time ago, praying for calm and tolerance on both sides! Given that the EU's foundations were partly laid in the energy sector, with the creation of the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951, and that. the central issues are very much legal ones, with law-making and constitutional powers and processes at their heart, it would be strange for this journal not to comment. The decision will also be a momentous one, of course, impacting on every sector in this country, one way or another. As former Prime Minister John Major said in a recent article, "It will decide Britain's place in the world for generations to come." Viewed from the perspective of the energy sector, does it make sense for this country to leave the EU? This writer's opinion (a personal, not an official, one) is emphatically not.
机译:随着6月23日,即英国就欧盟加入英国的公投日期临近,这场辩论比以往任何时候都更加激烈。热情变得如此热烈,以至于坎特伯雷大主教也认为在不久前介入是明智的,祈祷双方保持冷静与宽容!鉴于欧盟的基础部分地建立在能源领域,1951年建立了欧洲煤炭和钢铁共同体。核心问题是非常法律的问题,其核心是立法,宪法权力和程序,因此本期刊不予置评是很奇怪的。当然,这一决定也将是一个重大决定,以某种方式影响该国的每个部门。正如前首相约翰·梅杰(John Major)在最近的一篇文章中所说:“这将决定后代英国在世界上的地位。”从能源部门的角度来看,这个国家离开欧盟有意义吗?作者的观点(不是个人的,不是官员的)很强调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号