首页> 外文期刊>Interactive technology and smart education >Cognitive presence in virtual collaborative learning Assessing and improving critical thinking in online discussion forums
【24h】

Cognitive presence in virtual collaborative learning Assessing and improving critical thinking in online discussion forums

机译:虚拟协作学习中的认知存在评估和改进在线讨论论坛中的批判性思维

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to introduce a virtual collaborative learning setting called "Net Economy", which we established as part of an international learning network of currently six universities, and present our approach to continuously improve the course in each cycle. Design/methodology/approach - Using the community of inquiry framework as guidance and canonical action research (CAR) as the chosen research design, the discussion forum of the online course is assessed regarding its critical thinking value. We thereby measure critical thinking with the help of the according model provided by Newman et al. (1995), which differentiates 40 indicators of critical thinking from 10 different categories. Findings - The calculated critical thinking ratios for the analyzed two discussion threads indicate a strong use of outside knowledge, intensive justification and critical assessment of posts by the students. But at the same time, there are also weak spots, like manifold repetitions. Based on these results, we derive changes for the next course cycle to improve the critical thinking of the students. Originality/value - A comparison of the results after the next course cycle will then allow us to assess the effects of the implemented changes, which would not be possible without a critical thinking diagnosis approach.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是介绍一种称为“网络经济”的虚拟协作学习环境,我们将其建立为目前由六所大学组成的国际学习网络的一部分,并介绍了我们在每个周期中不断改进课程的方法。设计/方法/方法-使用探究框架社区作为指导,并使用规范动作研究(CAR)作为选定的研究设计,对在线课程的讨论论坛进行评估,以评估其批判性思维价值。因此,我们借助Newman等人提供的相应模型来评估批判性思维。 (1995),它把40个批判性思维指标与10个不同类别区分开来。调查结果-计算出的两个讨论线程的批判性思维比率表明,学生大量使用外部知识,深入的辩护和对职位的批判性评估。但同时,也有薄弱环节,例如多方面的重复。基于这些结果,我们得出下一个课程周期的变化,以改善学生的批判性思维。原创性/价值-在下一个课程周期后比较结果将使我们能够评估已实施更改的效果,如果没有批判性思维诊断方法,这是不可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号