...
首页> 外文期刊>Intelligent Transport Systems, IET >Advantage of cooperative traffic light control algorithms
【24h】

Advantage of cooperative traffic light control algorithms

机译:协同交通信号灯控制算法的优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contemporary traffic light control systems rely on sensors for detection of traffic which are costly in purchase, installation and maintenance. Emerging cooperative technology offers an attractive alternative where only one road side unit per intersection is required, instead of several infrastructure sensors per lane. However, studies showed that traffic control with cooperative detection requires a penetration rate of at least 20% to function effectively. To show the potential of cooperative traffic control, this study presents three algorithms: (i) the SWARM control algorithm, which is designed to work with very low penetration rates; (ii) an extension to the adaptive control algorithm, ImFlow, which uses cooperative data for enhanced queue modelling; and (iii) an ImFlow extension to stabilise green planning to enable green light optimal speed advice. The results from micro-simulation show a 7.8% improvement for stops and delay time over traditional adaptive control for Swarm, and 14.9% for Cooperative ImFlow. Adding planning stabilisation reduced the average perceived change for end users from 9.0-2.3%, without performance loss for the overall traffic flow. This shows the large potential of cooperative traffic control.
机译:当前的交通信号灯控制系统依靠传感器来检测交通,这在购买,安装和维护中成本很高。新兴的协作技术提供了一种有吸引力的替代方案,其中每个交叉路口仅需要一个路侧​​单元,而不是每个车道需要多个基础设施传感器。但是,研究表明,具有协同检测功能的流量控制需要至少20%的渗透率才能有效发挥作用。为了显示协同交通控制的潜力,本研究提出了三种算法:(i)SWARM控制算法,设计用于极低的渗透率; (ii)自适应控制算法ImFlow的扩展,该算法使用协作数据进行增强的队列建模; (iii)ImFlow扩展程序可稳定绿色规划,以实现最佳绿灯速度建议。微观仿真的结果表明,与传统的Swarm自适应控制相比,停止和延迟时间提高了7.8%,而协作式ImFlow则提高了14.9%。增加计划稳定性可以将最终用户的平均感知变化从9.0-2.3%减少到总体流量的性能不会损失的水平。这表明了协作交通控制的巨大潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号