32006 Armour Group Plc V Leisuretech Electronics Pty Ltd And Leisuretech Electronics Pty Ltd V (1) Armour Home Electronics Ltd (2) Qed Audio Products Ltd

摘要

Armour sought revocation of LeisureTech's patent and LeisureTech sued Armour and QED for infringement of the patent. Armour's main attack was obviousness in relation to the common general knowledge and to two items of prior art known as Linn Knekt and MRS, which turned out to add little to the main attack. The trial was conducted on the basis of claim 1 as proposed to be amended.