首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Mismatches between ‘Scientific’ and ‘Non-Scientific’ Ways of Knowing and Their Contributions to Public Understanding of Science
【24h】

Mismatches between ‘Scientific’ and ‘Non-Scientific’ Ways of Knowing and Their Contributions to Public Understanding of Science

机译:“科学的”和“非科学的”知识方式的不匹配及其对公众科学理解的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As differentiation within scientific disciplines increases, so does differentiation between the sciences and other ways of knowing. This distancing between ‘scientific’ and ‘non-scientific’ cultures reflects differences in what are considered valid and reliable approaches to acquiring knowledge and has played a major role in recent science-oriented controversies. Scientists’ reluctance to actively engage in science communication, coupled with journalists’ reliance on the norms of balance, conflict, and human interest in covering scientific issues, have combined to exacerbate public mistrust of science on issues like the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. The failure of effective communications between scientists and non-scientists has hindered the progress of both effective science and effective policy. In order to better bridge the gap between the ‘scientific’ and ‘non-scientific’ cultures, renewed efforts must be made to encourage substantive public engagement, with the ultimate goal of facilitating an open, democratic policy-making process.
机译:随着科学学科之间差异的增加,科学与其他知识方式之间的差异也随之增加。 “科学”文化与“非科学”文化之间的这种区别反映了在获取知识的有效和可靠方法上的差异,并且在最近的以科学为导向的争论中发挥了重要作用。科学家不愿积极参与科学交流,再加上记者依靠平衡,冲突和人类利益准则来报道科学问题,加重了公众对麻疹,腮腺炎,风疹(MMR)等问题的科学不信任)疫苗。科学家与非科学家之间无法进行有效的沟通阻碍了有效科学和有效政策的发展。为了更好地弥合“科学”文化与“非科学”文化之间的鸿沟,必须重新努力鼓励实质性的公众参与,其最终目标是促进开放,民主的决策过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号