首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >A Comment on Andrew C. Papanicolaou’s “BEYOND EDDINGTON’S ARGUMENT”: Pragmatism in Scientific Knowledge and Perception
【24h】

A Comment on Andrew C. Papanicolaou’s “BEYOND EDDINGTON’S ARGUMENT”: Pragmatism in Scientific Knowledge and Perception

机译:评论安德鲁·C·帕帕尼科劳(Andrew C. Papanicolaou)的“超越爱丁顿的论点”:科学知识和感知中的实用主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I agree with Andrew C. Papanicolaou’s claim that human beings’ cognitive ability can reach to the real world, but don’t agree with his claim that the order of this world is akin to our thought. In this commentary paper, I will first defend a recent pragmatic scientific realism called as “entity realism” or “referential realism” which affirms that we are able to reach the real world not by inference but by technological, engineering settings. In the second half of this paper, I will also affirm that our perceptual ability directly reaches the reality too, in referring to the ecological psychology of James J. Gibson.
机译:我同意安德鲁·C·帕帕尼科拉(Andrew C. Papanicolaou)的说法,即人类的认知能力可以达到现实世界,但不同意他关于这个世界的秩序类似于我们的思想的说法。在这篇评论文章中,我将首先捍卫一种最新的务实的科学现实主义,称为“实体现实主义”或“指称现实主义”,它申明我们能够通过推理而不是通过技术,工程环境到达现实世界。在本文的下半部分,我还要肯定的是,我们在参考詹姆斯·吉布森(James J. Gibson)的生态心理学时,我们的感知能力也直接达到了现实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号