...
首页> 外文期刊>Insurance >A benchmarking approach to track and compare administrative charges on flow and balance in individual account pension systems
【24h】

A benchmarking approach to track and compare administrative charges on flow and balance in individual account pension systems

机译:追踪和比较各个账户养老金系统流量和余额的行政费用的基准方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article studies the effects on individual welfare caused by administrative charges or fees on balance (assets) and flow (contributions) during the accumulation phase of a defined-contribution (DC) pension plan under the system of individual retirement accounts (IA). Assuming a complete financial market and suitable deterministic functions to model contributions and administrative charges, we are able to contrast the optimal expected utility of terminal wealth generated under both charge schemes. In this framework, we also derive closed-form expressions to determine equivalent administrative charges, that is, the precise level of charges on flow and balance that makes them indifferent to the risk-averse participant. These expressions are independent of the market price of risk, the risky asset's volatility and the participant's utility function. Furthermore, our methodology can be helpful for regulators and policy makers aiming to dynamically track the future evolution of administrative charges or to fairly compare costs across DC pension systems, especially those operating under charge on flow. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的研究引起的:在规定的缴款(DC)养老金计划的个人退休账户(IA)的系统下的积累阶段上平衡行政事业性收费或费用(资产)和流(捐款)对个人福利的影响。假设一个完整的金融市场和合适的确定性函数模型的贡献和行政事业性收费,我们可以对比两个充电方案下产生的终端财富的最佳预期效用。在此框架内,我们也从中获得封闭形式的表达式来确定同等的行政收费,也就是对流量和费用的平衡精确水平,使他们淡泊的规避风险的参与者。这些表达式是独立的市场价格风险,对风险资产的波动性和参与者的效用函数。此外,我们的方法可以用于监管机构和政策制定者,旨在动态跟踪的行政事业性收费或跨DC养老金制度公平比较的成本,尤其是在上流动的电荷经营者的未来发展有帮助的。 (c)2021 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号