首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >The Role of Evil in Kant's Liberalism
【24h】

The Role of Evil in Kant's Liberalism

机译:邪恶在康德自由主义中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carl Schmitt distinguishes between political theories in terms of whether they rest on the anthropological assumption that man is evil by nature or on the anthropological assumption that man is good by nature, and he claims that liberal political theory is based on the latter assumption. Contrary to this claim, I show how Kant's liberalism is shaped by his theory of the radical evil in human nature, and that his liberalism corresponds to the characterization of liberalism that Schmitt himself offers. My discussion of this issue will be shown to have certain implications with respect to the view that for Kant evil is the product of society. I show that this view is mistaken insofar as it fails to recognize that Kant's political philosophy implies that human beings require the type of society that best suits their radically evil natures, namely, a commercial one in which the "vices of culture" largely have free play, while the state's role is limited to that of preventing the antagonisms found in society leading to the mutual destruction of its members.
机译:卡尔·施密特在政治理论上是基于人类是自然界邪恶的人类学假设还是基于人类是自然界善良的人类学假设来区分政治理论,他声称自由政治理论是基于后者的。与此主张相反,我展示了康德的自由主义是如何被他关于人性的根本邪恶的理论所塑造的,并且他的自由主义与施密特本人所提供的自由主义的特征相对应。关于康德的邪恶是社会的产物这一观点,我对这个问题的讨论将显示出一定的含义。我表明,这种观点是错误的,因为它没有认识到康德的政治哲学暗示着人类需要一种最适合其根本邪恶性质的社会类型,即一种商业形式,在这种商业形式中,“文化的支持者”在很大程度上具有自由。国家的作用仅限于防止在社会中发现导致其成员相互​​毁灭的对抗。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2012年第3期|p.238-261|共24页
  • 作者

    DAVID JAMES;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Politics, University of Johannesburg, Kingsway Campus, C Ring 701, P. O. Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号