A Strong Compatibilist Account of Settling

摘要

In A Metaphysics for Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), Helen Steward argues that agents settle things when they act, and that in order for agents to settle things, the universe must be indeterministic. Steward suggests a 'weak' account of settling, on which settling is compatible with determinism, but she rightly claims that this weak account is unacceptable. In this paper, I argue that the weak account of settling is not the best account of settling available to the compatibilist. In the first part of this paper, I present a 'strong' compatibilist account of settling, and argue that this account avoids the problems faced by the weak account. In the second part of this paper, I argue against Stewards claim that compatibilist accounts of settling must depend on the truth of causal theories of action.