首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >Surviving death: how to refute termination theses
【24h】

Surviving death: how to refute termination theses

机译:尚存的死亡:如何反驳终结论点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When deciding how 'death' should be defined, it is helpful to consider cases in which vital functions are restored to an organism long after those vital functions have ceased. Here I consider whether such restoration cases can be used to refute termination theses. Focusing largely on the termination thesis applied to human animals (the view that when human animals die they cease to exist), I develop a line of argument from the possibility of human restoration to the conclusion that in many actual cases, human animals continue to exist after they die. The line of reasoning developed here can be extended to show that other organisms survive death in many actual cases. This line of reasoning improves on other arguments that have been offered against termination theses. And if my argument regarding human animals surviving death is successful, then assuming that human persons are animals, we can also conclude that human persons in many actual cases continue to exist after death.
机译:在决定应如何定义“死亡”时,考虑在生命机能停止很长时间后生命机能得以恢复的情况会很有帮助。在这里,我考虑是否可以使用此类恢复案例来驳斥终止论文。我主要关注适用于人类动物的终结论(当人类动物死亡时,它们将不复存在的观点),我提出了一条论点,从人类恢复的可能性到结论,即在许多实际情况下,人类动物继续存在他们死后。在这里发展的推理路线可以扩展,以表明其他生物在许多实际情况下都可以幸免于难。这种推理方式改进了反对终止论点的其他论点。而且,如果我关于人类动物存活下来的论点是成功的,那么假设人类是动物,我们还可以得出结论,在许多实际情况下,人类在死亡后仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号