首页> 外文期刊>Information economics and policy >The economics of universal service: An analysis of entry subsidies for high speed broadband
【24h】

The economics of universal service: An analysis of entry subsidies for high speed broadband

机译:普遍服务的经济学:对高速宽带的入门补贴的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Universal service is a policy objective that all individuals or households have access to some service. Subsidy policies to accomplish universal service may arise when private provision is non-universal. In the context of rural high speed wired broadband subsidies, this paper examines novel household-level cable and satellite broadband subscription data from North Carolina to examine household adoption and substitution patterns across broadband types to evaluate how many currently unserved regions warrant an entry subsidy. This paper has three main findings: (i) fewer than 43% of households adopt high speed broadband in areas currently served by a single broadband provider, (ii) there exists evidence of a significant elasticity of substitution between high speed wired broadband and the lower speed options of satellite broadband and DSL, and (iii) a generous upper bound on the number of regions that warrant an entry subsidy is 64%. These results suggest a policy of universal high speed wired broadband service in North Carolina would be unlikely to achieve universal adoption, would connect many households already with internet access and who would not substitute, and in many regions would be prohibitively costly even assuming very generous estimates of the consumer surplus generated. From the perspective of social welfare, to justify connecting the 5% least dense areas of North Carolina would require each adopting household value high speed wired broadband access at more than $1519 per month. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:普遍服务是所有个人或家庭都可以使用某些服务的政策目标。当私人提供不普遍时,可能会出现实现普遍服务的补贴政策。在农村高速有线宽带补贴的背景下,本文研究了北卡罗来纳州的新型家庭级电缆和卫星宽带签约数据,以研究跨宽带类型的家庭采用和替代模式,以评估当前有多少服务区需要进入补贴。本文有三个主要发现:(i)当前只有一家宽带提供商提供服务的地区中,不到43%的家庭采用高速宽带;(ii)有证据表明,高速有线宽带和低端有线宽带之间的替代弹性很大。卫星宽带和DSL的高速选项,以及(iii)需获得入境补贴的区域数量的上限是64%。这些结果表明,北卡罗来纳州的通用高速有线宽带服务政策不太可能获得普遍采用,无法将许多已经接入互联网且无法替代的家庭连接起来,而且在许多地区,即使假设进行了非常慷慨的估算,其费用也将过高产生的消费者剩余。从社会福利的角度来看,要证明连接北卡罗来纳州5%人口密度最低的区域是合理的,则要求每个采用家庭价值的高速有线宽带接入的费用都超过1519美元。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号