首页> 外文期刊>Information development >The worst in the world?
【24h】

The worst in the world?

机译:世界上最糟糕的?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It would need a systematic survey with carefully agreed criteria to decide which country produces the worst LIS research in the world. However, there are several strong contenders under any set of rules. Reports, theses and articles pour out of some countries like a flood. For instance, in several countries, Nigeria for example, not only are LIS academics promoted and rewarded on a 'publish or perish' basis, but academic librarians are too. So there is a practical reason why a large number of LIS-qualified people do research and seek further degrees and publication. However, this pressure doesn't explain the careless, lazy and sometimes downright dishonest outcomes that disgrace the whole professional community of some countries by association. This is all very unfair on anyone from such a country who is trying hard to write good research-based material, but many colleagues are letting them down very badly.
机译:这需要系统的调查,并需要经过认真商定的标准,才能确定哪个国家进行的LIS研究在世界上最差。但是,在任何一套规则下都有几个强有力的竞争者。报告,论文和文章像洪水一样涌出一些国家。例如,在尼日利亚等多个国家,不仅LIS学者在“出版或灭亡”的基础上得到晋升和奖励,而且学术馆员也是如此。因此,存在一个实际的原因,为什么大量具有LIS资格的人们进行研究并寻求进一步的学位和出版物。但是,这种压力并不能解释粗心大意,懒惰,有时甚至是彻头彻尾的不诚实结果,这些结果使一些国家的整个职业社区蒙羞。对于来自这样一个国家的任何人来说,这都是非常不公平的,他们正在努力编写出色的基于研究的材料,但是许多同事却让他们非常失望。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Information development》 |2010年第2期|P.192|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号