...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >Internet risks and expert views: a case study of the insider perspectives of youth workers in Hong Kong
【24h】

Internet risks and expert views: a case study of the insider perspectives of youth workers in Hong Kong

机译:互联网风险和专家观点:以香港青年工人的内部观点为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study collects and analyses the viewpoints of front-line youth workers regarding the notion of 'Internet risks'. Previous studies have examined and discussed various dangers of the Internet. Parental, school, and governmental interventions are often called for by those concerned. The implicit assumption is that these are the people who possess the expertise to tackle the problems at hand. Through participation in three forums focusing on 'Internet risks', and in-depth interviews with 10 such 'experts' in Hong Kong, the study examines if this is a valid assumption. It finds that experts perceive Internet risks rather differently. In addition to the more conventional views about content, contact and conduct risks, our interviewees are aware that a new order is quickly emerging in the new media environment. Despite being considered as 'experts', they do not necessarily know how to tackle the so-called 'youth-at-risk'. Rather, they are exploring how they would capitalize on the opportunities offered by the developments. The key findings highlight the need to critically review the notion of 'Internet risks'. As with other risk frameworks, the ultimate aim is to develop intervention programmes. In this regard, risks are often treated as concrete problems that can be solved. Youth experts, however, find that the changing scope, speed and persistence of communication in today's information society present the biggest challenge in youth work. The existing framework of risks was unable to describe and account for such risks. In response, Internet risk has to be reconceptualized so that more updated, relevant and imaginative intervention can be introduced.
机译:这项研究收集并分析了前线青年工人关于“互联网风险”概念的观点。先前的研究已经检查并讨论了Internet的各种危险。有关人员经常要求父母,学校和政府干预。隐含的假设是,这些人是拥有解决当前问题的专业知识的人。通过参加三个针对“互联网风险”的论坛,并在香港与10位此类“专家”进行了深入访谈,研究研究了这一假设是否成立。它发现专家们对互联网风险的看法大不相同。除了对内容,联系和行为风险的更常规看法外,我们的受访者还意识到,新秩序正在新媒体环境中迅速兴起。尽管被视为“专家”,但他们不一定知道如何应对所谓的“有风险的青年”。相反,他们正在探索如何利用事态发展所提供的机会。主要发现表明,有必要严格审查“互联网风险”的概念。与其他风险框架一样,最终目标是制定干预计划。在这方面,风险通常被视为可以解决的具体问题。然而,青年专家发现,当今信息社会中交流的范围,速度和持续性的变化对青年工作提出了最大的挑战。现有的风险框架无法描述和解释此类风险。因此,必须重新概念化互联网风险,以便可以引入更多更新,相关和富于想象力的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号