...
首页> 外文期刊>Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on >Demand Response: Social Welfare Maximization in an Unbundled Energy Market Case Study for the Low-Voltage Networks of a Distribution Network Operator in The Netherlands
【24h】

Demand Response: Social Welfare Maximization in an Unbundled Energy Market Case Study for the Low-Voltage Networks of a Distribution Network Operator in The Netherlands

机译:需求响应:无限制能源市场中的社会福利最大化案例研究,针对荷兰配电网络运营商的低压网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the introduction of smart meters, dynamic pricing, and home energy management systems, residential customers are able to react to changes in electricity prices. In an unbundled market, the energy supplier and the network operator may have conflicting interests with respect to demand response (DR) programs. As customer participation is essential to a well-functioning DR program, it is needed to assess which DR programs offer most customer benefits. Two DR program options are analyzed for low-voltage feeders: a program from the energy supplier based on the electricity price, and a DR program from the network operator based on the loading of the network. Depending on the network topology the benefits can change significantly between the two DR programs. DR from an energy supplier point of view might induce undervoltages which lead to additional network reinforcements, while load shifting from a network point of view can generate higher electricity cost.
机译:随着智能电表,动态定价和家庭能源管理系统的推出,居民用户能够对电价的变化做出反应。在捆绑市场中,能源供应商和网络运营商在需求响应(DR)程序方面可能有利益冲突。由于客户参与对于运作良好的灾难恢复计划至关重要,因此需要评估哪些灾难恢复计划可以为客户带来最大的利益。分析了低压馈线的两个DR程序选项:能源供应商基于电价的程序,以及网络运营商基于网络负载的DR程序。根据网络拓扑的不同,两个DR程序之间的优势可能会发生显着变化。从能源供应商的角度来看,灾难恢复可能会引起欠压,从而导致额外的网络增强,而从网络角度来看,负载转移可能会产生更高的电力成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号