首页> 外文期刊>The Independent Review: a journal of political economy >Are All Commons Tragedies? The Case of Bison in the Nineteenth Century
【24h】

Are All Commons Tragedies? The Case of Bison in the Nineteenth Century

机译:都是公地悲剧吗?十九世纪的野牛案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The history of the American bison is one of rational individuals operating under an institutional framework that did not create a tragedy of the commons. It is true that property rights were not well defined and established for bison on the open prairies, but because bison were not a valuable resource, property-rights entrepreneurs put little effort into establishing rights for them. And even if there had been well-defined and enforced property rights, cattle would still have replaced bison as the primary converter of grass on the Great Plains. The adjustment from bison to cattle may not have been perfect, but there is no evidence of large-scale rent dissipation. When bison did become valuable as they came close to complete extermination, entrepreneurs established rights to live animals and prevented their complete demise. Thus, economists who wish to describe how rational individuals under an open-access resource will overuse that resource should turn to some other example than that of the American bison. And economists should recognize that other situations of rapid depletion of a resource do not necessarily represent the tragedy of the commons if the analysis has ignored important opportunity costs.
机译:美洲野牛的历史是在没有造成公地悲剧的制度框架下运作的理性个体之一。的确,在野外草原上,对野牛的财产权没有得到很好的定义和确立,但是由于野牛不是宝贵的资源,因此,产权企业家不费吹灰之力为他们建立权利。即使存在明确定义并得到强制执行的财产权,牛仍将取代野牛成为大平原上草的主要转化者。从野牛到牛的调整可能并不完美,但没有证据表明大规模地耗费租金。当野牛接近灭绝时确实变得很有价值时,企业家们确立了活体动物的权利并阻止了它们的彻底灭绝。因此,希望描述开放获取资源下的理性个体如何过度使用该资源的经济学家应该转向美国野牛以外的其他例子。并且,经济学家应该认识到,如果分析忽略了重要的机会成本,那么其他资源快速枯竭的情况并不一定代表公地的悲剧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号