首页> 外文期刊>IIC:International review of intellectual property and competition law >Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) Agreements Under AML 2008 - Per Se Illegal Treatment vis-a-vis the Rule-of-Reason Approach
【24h】

Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) Agreements Under AML 2008 - Per Se Illegal Treatment vis-a-vis the Rule-of-Reason Approach

机译:《 AML 2008》下的转售价格维持(RPM)协议-相对于“基于规则的方法”的逐个非法处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Resale price maintenance could be both beneficial and harmful to competition in various circumstances. It would only constitute a vertical monopolistic agreement where the anti-competitive effect cannot be addressed or offset by the pro-competitive effect. RPM has been scrutinised in private litigation in the U.S., the EU and China regarding whether it is per se illegal or subject to the rule of reason. The Shanghai Court and the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) may find it challenging to determine whether RPM can substantially increase the efficiency of a distribution chain or restrict competition.
机译:在各种情况下,转售价格维持可能对竞争有利,也可能有害。它只会构成一种纵向的垄断协议,在这种情况下,反竞争效果不能被亲竞争效果所解决或抵消。在美国,欧盟和中国的私人诉讼中,已对RPM进行了审查,以查明RPM本身是非法的还是受合理规则约束的。上海法院和国家发展和改革委员会(NDRC)可能会发现,确定RPM能否大幅提高分销链的效率或限制竞争具有挑战性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号