...
首页> 外文期刊>Reliability, IEEE Transactions on >Decision Making in Reliability
【24h】

Decision Making in Reliability

机译:可靠性决策

获取原文
           

摘要

Distribution-free methods are evolved for 4 models of evaluating time-to-failure. Two decision procedures for choosing the better of two equipments are given in models I & II. Decision procedures for whether two equipments have the same availability or reliability are given in models III & IV; in these models, it is assumed that the mission time is a r.v. in the interval (0, T0). The method of model I is superior to existing tests like the Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum test and Mann-Whitney test in a particular case. Model II is based on the time taken to return to the initial state by a Markov chain and is optimum for large sample sizes. In model III, even though the distributions of time to failure and time to repair-completion are negative exponential, the method is general, distribution-free and optimal. Hence the type I error is constant even if the distributions of time to failure and repair-completion differ from the assumed distributions. Model IV is also distribution-free and optimum.
机译:无分布方法已演变为评估故障时间的4种模型。在模型I和II中给出了两种选择最佳设备的决策程序。模型III和IV中给出了两个设备是否具有相同可用性或可靠性的决策程序;在这些模型中,假设任务时间为r.v.在时间间隔(0,T0)中。模型I的方法优于特定情况下的现有检验,例如Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum检验和Mann-Whitney检验。模型II基于马尔可夫链返回初始状态所花费的时间,并且对于大样本量而言是最佳的。在模型III中,即使失效时间和修复完成时间的分布为负指数,该方法仍是通用,无分布且最优的。因此,即使故障时间和维修完成时间的分布与假定的分布不同,I类错误也保持恒定。型号IV也是无分配且最佳的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号