首页> 外文期刊>Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on >Instructional Design for Stem-Based Collaborative, Colocated Classroom Composition
【24h】

Instructional Design for Stem-Based Collaborative, Colocated Classroom Composition

机译:基于词干的协作式,共置教室组成的教学设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research problem: Our study focuses on how students collaborate online to produce specific written genres, using particular collaborative technologies to work together productively, and how instructor feedback and student perspectives on collaborative work influence those activities in online classrooms. Research questions: When composing using collaborative web-based writing applications, do students focus primarily on the interface or the text space? What kinds of expectations about collaborative writing do students bring to the interface and text space? To what extent can we characterize students' acknowledgement of a third space, what we have identified as “communicative interaction?” Literature review: Workplace collaboration is important because organizations increasingly demand effective collaborators, team members, and team leaders, and technologies for sharing, cobuilding, and feedback are readily available to support these activities. Student preparation for workplace collaboration is important because students struggle when they are asked to write together, particularly when the collaborative process involves new technologies, and yet knowledge of collaborative writing strategies and experience with collaborative technologies, such as Google Docs, are the very competencies that organizations expect of them. Methodology: Thirteen groups of 3 to 4 technical writing students and science communication students enrolled in online professional writing courses at a major research university wrote feature specifications and reports on the globalization of the sciences, respectively, using Google Docs within Google Drive. Sixteen of 37 students responded to a set of questions asking them to reflect on their experiences working collaboratively, learning new genres, using the collaborative environment, and revising with instructor feedback. Results and conclusions: We found that students struggled most with adapting their already established collabor- tive strategies grounded in face-to-face learning situations to an online learning environment, where they felt their means of communication and expression were limited. The results suggest that effective collaborative experiences, properly executed, represent a repertoire of competencies that go well beyond only technical considerations, such as being able to effectively assign roles, set milestones, and navigate the numerous tasks and processes of writing as a team. The small number of students and the single instructor with her own particular feedback style limit the study. Future research includes looking at how different feedback styles influence student collaborative writing.
机译:研究问题:我们的研究重点是学生如何在线协作以产生特定的笔迹,使用特定的协作技术进行富有成效的协作,以及教师反馈和学生对协作工作的看法如何影响在线教室中的这些活动。研究问题:使用基于网络的协作写作应用程序进行写作时,学生主要关注界面还是文本空间?学生对界面和文本空间带来了什么样的协作写作期望?我们可以在多大程度上表征学生对第三空间的认可,我们称之为“交流互动”?文献回顾:工作场所的协作非常重要,因为组织越来越需要有效的协作者,团队成员和团队负责人,并且随时可以使用用于共享,共同构建和反馈的技术来支持这些活动。学生为工作场所协作做准备很重要,因为当要求学生一起写作时,尤其是在协作过程涉及新技术时,学生会很努力,而协作写作策略的知识和使用协作技术(例如Google Docs)的经验正是他们的能力。组织期望他们。方法:在主要研究型大学就读在线专业写作课程的13至3至4组技术写作学生和科学传播学生,分别使用Google云端硬盘中的Google文档编写了功能规范和有关科学全球化的报告。在37名学生中,有16名回答了一系列问题,要求他们反思自己的协作工作经验,学习新类型,使用协作环境并通过教师反馈进行修订。结果与结论:我们发现,在面对面学习的情况下,他们已经适应了已经建立的合作策略,以适应在线学习环境,他们感到沟通和表达方式受到限制,这是学生们最大的努力。结果表明,正确执行的有效协作经验代表了胜任力,这不仅仅是技术方面的考虑,例如能够有效地分配角色,设定里程碑并以团队的方式处理众多任务和写作过程。少数学生和具有自己特殊反馈风格的单一教师限制了学习。未来的研究包括研究不同的反馈方式如何影响学生的协作写作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号