...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing >Ocean surface wind fields estimated from satellite active and passive microwave instruments
【24h】

Ocean surface wind fields estimated from satellite active and passive microwave instruments

机译:通过卫星有源和无源微波仪器估算的海面风场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines the consistency of surface wind-speeds estimated from the European Remote Sensing Satellite (ERS-1) scatterometer, ERS-1 altimeter, and the special sensor microwave/imager (SSM/I). The goal is to combine these wind estimates to produce surface wind fields. With this in mind, a comparison with buoy wind measurements and comparison among the three sensors is performed. According to the in situ data, the rms errors of the three wind estimates are all within 2 m/s. The differences between the remotely sensed and buoy windspeeds are studied according to atmospheric and oceanic variables, and their impact is shown. A large data base is obtained from the comparisons among the three sensor winds. The rms values of the differences between the scatterometer and the altimeter and between the scatterometer and the SSM/I are 1.67 and 1.45 m/s, respectively. There is no global bias between the scatterometer and the SSM/I, but between the scatterometer and the altimeter windspeeds, the bias is about 0.30 m/s. Furthermore, it is shown that the difference between the scatterometer and the altimeter wind estimates is dependent on the significant wave height, while the difference between the scatterometer and the SSM/I winds is dependent on the integrated water vapor content. The comparison enables some corrections to be made for consistency and combining products. The use of combining scatterometer, altimeter, and SSM/I wind estimates is illustrated by two examples.
机译:这项研究检查了根据欧洲遥感卫星(ERS-1)散射仪,ERS-1高度计和特殊传感器微波/成像仪(SSM / I)估算的表面风速的一致性。目标是将这些风估计值结合起来以产生地表风场。考虑到这一点,进行了浮标风测量的比较以及三个传感器之间的比较。根据现场数据,这三个风估计的均方根误差均在2 m / s之内。根据大气和海洋变量研究了遥感和浮标风速之间的差异,并显示了它们的影响。从三个传感器风向的比较中获得了很大的数据库。散射仪和高度计之间以及散射仪和SSM / I之间的差异的rms值分别为1.67和1.45 m / s。散射仪和SSM / I之间没有全局偏差,但是在散射仪和高度计风速之间,该偏差约为0.30 m / s。此外,表明散射仪和高度计风估计之间的差异取决于有效波高,而散射仪和SSM / I风之间的差异取决于积分的水蒸气含量。通过比较,可以对一致性和组合产品进行一些更正。通过两个示例说明了组合散射仪,高度计和SSM / I风速估算的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号