...
首页> 外文期刊>Security & Privacy, IEEE >Regulating Cybersecurity: Institutional Learning or a Lesson in Futility?
【24h】

Regulating Cybersecurity: Institutional Learning or a Lesson in Futility?

机译:监管网络安全:制度学习还是徒劳无益?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On 22 November 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved the latest version of mandatory cybersecurity regulations for the bulk electric system--known as Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards. The CIP standards are relatively unique: they are developed through an unusual model of industry-led regulation that places industry, and not federal regulators, at the center of regulatory design and enforcement. The CIP regulations have received a significant amount of criticism. Critics argue that the regulations are incomplete at best and irreparably flawed at worst. The author examines the lessons we can learn from the CIP standards and poses a provocative question: Are the regulations actually a secret success?
机译:2013年11月22日,联邦能源管理委员会批准了针对大型电力系统的最新版强制性网络安全法规,称为关键基础设施保护(CIP)可靠性标准。 CIP标准相对独特:它们是通过一种行业主导的监管模型开发的,该模型将行业而非联邦监管机构置于监管设计和执行的中心。 CIP法规受到了很多批评。批评者认为,这些法规充其量是不完整的,最坏的情况是不可弥补的缺陷。作者研究了我们可以从CIP标准中学到的经验教训,并提出了一个挑衅性的问题:法规实际上是秘密的成功吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号