...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Development International >Team creativity versus team learning: transcending conceptual boundaries to inspire future framework building
【24h】

Team creativity versus team learning: transcending conceptual boundaries to inspire future framework building

机译:团队创造力与团队学习:超越概念界限,激发未来框架的建立

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare team creativity and team learning -approached as interpersonal processes - conceptually and empirically and thereby inspire future framework building on team creativity. First, both concepts were compared based on present literature. In the next - empirical - step, a questionnaire consisting of a range of team creative and learning processes was developed and validated among 112 design teams, encompassing 540 employees. By means of a questionnaire validation protocol, this study assessed the empirical similarities and interrelation between team creative and learning processes. Several conceptual similarities in both frameworks were identified. The theoretically expected difference between team creativity and team learning (i.e. the aspect newness) was not supported by our empirical results. A five-factor model - consisting of team creative efficacy, facilitating team processes, basic team processes, error communication, and co-construction was validated. This study contributes to the present literature by showing that future theorising on team creative processes can certainly draw inspiration from the team learning literature in several ways.
机译:这项研究的目的是从概念和经验上比较团队创造力和团队学习(作为人际交往的过程),从而激发未来基于团队创造力的框架。首先,根据现有文献对两个概念进行了比较。在下一步(基于经验的步骤)中,由112个设计团队(包括540名员工)开发并验证了由一系列团队创意和学习过程组成的问卷。通过问卷验证协议,本研究评估了团队创造力和学习过程之间的经验相似性和相互关系。在两个框架中确定了几个概念上的相似之处。我们的经验结果不支持团队创造力和团队学习之间理论上的预期差异(即方面方面的新颖性)。验证了由团队创造力,促进团队流程,基本团队流程,错误沟通和共建构成的五因素模型。这项研究通过显示未来关于团队创造过程的理论无疑可以以多种方式从团队学习文献中汲取灵感,从而为当前文献做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号