首页> 外文期刊>Human Factors >Evaluating Medical Devices Remotely: Current Methods and Potential Innovations
【24h】

Evaluating Medical Devices Remotely: Current Methods and Potential Innovations

机译:远程评估医疗设备:目前的方法和潜在创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective We present examples of laboratory and remote studies, with a focus on studies appropriate for medical device design and evaluation. From this review and description of extant options for remote testing, we provide methods and tools to achieve research goals remotely. Background The FDA mandates human factors evaluation of medical devices. Studies show similarities and differences in results collected in laboratories compared to data collected remotely in non-laboratory settings. Remote studies show promise, though many of these are behavioral studies related to cognitive or experimental psychology. Remote usability studies are rare but increasing, as technologies allow for synchronous and asynchronous data collection. Method We reviewed methods of remote evaluation of medical devices, from testing labels and instruction to usability testing and simulated use. Each method was coded for the attributes (e.g., supported media) that need consideration in usability studies. Results We present examples of how published usability studies of medical devices could be moved to remote data collection. We also present novel systems for creating such tests, such as the use of 3D printed or virtual prototypes. Finally, we advise on targeted participant recruitment. Conclusion Remote testing will bring opportunities and challenges to the field of medical device testing. Current methods are adequate for most purposes, excepting the validation of Class III devices. Application The tools we provide enable the remote evaluation of medical devices. Evaluations have specific research goals, and our framework of attributes helps to select or combine tools for valid testing of medical devices.
机译:目的我们提出了实验室和远程研究的例子,重点是适合医疗器械设计和评估的研究。从此审查和描述远程测试的备注选项,我们提供远程实现研究目标的方法和工具。背景技术FDA授权医疗器械的人为因素评估。与在非实验室环境中远程收集的数据相比,研究表明实验室收集的结果的相似性和差异。远程研究表明承诺,尽管其中许多是与认知或实验心理有关的行为研究。远程可用性研究很少但增加,因为技术允许同步和异步数据收集。方法我们审查了远程评估医疗器械的方法,从测试标签和指令到可用性测试和模拟使用。每个方法都针对可用性研究中需要考虑的属性(例如,支持的媒体)进行编码。结果我们提出了如何将医疗设备的可用性研究转移到远程数据收集的示例。我们还提出了用于创建此类测试的新系统,例如使用3D打印或虚拟原型。最后,我们建议有针对性的参与者招聘。结论远程测试将为医疗设备测试领域带来机会和挑战。除了验证III设备的验证之外,目前的方法是足够的大多数目的。应用程序我们提供的工具使得能够远程评估医疗设备。评估具有特定的研究目标,我们的属性框架有助于选择或组合用于医疗设备的有效测试的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号