...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Pacing extremely old patients: who decides- the doctor, the patient, or the relatives?
【24h】

Pacing extremely old patients: who decides- the doctor, the patient, or the relatives?

机译:为极老的患者起搏:由谁决定-医生,患者还是亲戚?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Decision making competence is not necessarily present or absent. In many cases it is partial or compromised. This applies especially to tnose over 80 years old, in whom the prevalence of dementia is high. Three patients who presented with indications for permanent pacemaker insertion are considered. One was apparently competent, one had partial competence, and one was clearly incompetent. In all three cases the closest relatives were opposed to decisions made by either the patient or the doctors. The three cases reflect the tension between doctors, patients, and relatives in situations where medical interests, individual interests, and familial interests conflict. The cases illustrate the type of problems encountered in clinical practice. The current legal position is reviewed.
机译:决策能力不一定存在或不存在。在许多情况下,它是部分或受到损害的。这尤其适用于80岁以上的鼻子,其中痴呆症的患病率很高。考虑三名表现出永久性起搏器插入的患者。一个人显然胜任,一个人具有部分能力,另一个人显然没有能力。在这三种情况下,最亲近的亲戚都反对患者或医生的决定。这三个案例反映了在医疗利益,个人利益和家庭利益发生冲突的情况下,医生,患者和亲属之间的紧张关系。这些案例说明了临床实践中遇到的问题类型。审查当前的法律地位。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Heart》 |2004年第2期|p.134-135|共2页
  • 作者

    G M Sayers; H W L Bethell;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Geriatric and General Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心脏、血管(循环系)疾病;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号