...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology >Detecting systematic discrepancies in nursing home assessments of residents
【24h】

Detecting systematic discrepancies in nursing home assessments of residents

机译:发现居民养老院评估中的系统差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement received by nursing homes are linked to the care needs of residents in a facility. Thus, a facility may have an incentive to overestimate the care needs of residents. To evaluate this, a sample of nursing homes in Ohio was selected, and independent assessors were sent to sampled facilities, and the rating of residents by the independent assessor was compared to a similar rating by the staff at nursing homes. We first evaluated whether the independent assessors were homogeneous with respect to agreement with nursing facility assessors using a permutation test procedure. Since there was evidence of heterogeneity among the independent assessors, we evaluated agreement between the independent nurse and facility assessors separately for each independent nurse. Responses were collapsed into three categories: independent assessor was lower, equal or greater than the facility assessor. Under a null hypothesis that lower and greater categories were equally probable, the maximum likelihood estimate of the vector of probabilities corresponding to these categories was constructed for each independent assessor. The P-value for detecting a difference between independent and facility assessors was calculated for each facility by summing the multinomial probabilities of obtaining a result at least as extreme as observed in the direction of the “lower” category being more probable. Five of the 39 facilities had P-value < 0.10 with three of the low P-value facilities occurring in reviews by one of the independent assessors. We believe that there is not evidence of systematic differences between the facility assessors and independent assessors although a caveat associated with this statement is the power of this assessment procedure is strongly linked to number of cases reviewed per facility along with the size of the effect expected. We believe this provides a screening mechanism to identify facilities where additional samples are warranted.
机译:疗养院收到的Medicare和Medicaid报销与设施中居民的护理需求相关。因此,设施可能会诱使人们高估居民的照料需求。为了对此进行评估,我们选择了俄亥俄州的一家养老院样本,并将独立评估师送到抽样机构,并将独立评估师对居民的评分与养老院工作人员的类似评分进行了比较。我们首先使用排列测试程序评估了独立评估师在与护理机构评估师的协议方面是否一致。由于有证据表明独立评估者之间存在异质性,因此我们针对每个独立护士分别评估了独立护士和机构评估者之间的协议。回应分为三类:独立评估者的水平低于,等于或高于设施评估者。在较低和较大类别同等可能性的零假设下,为每个独立评估者构建与这些类别相对应的概率向量的最大似然估计。通过将获得结果的多项式概率相加,计算出用于检测独立评估者与设施评估者之间差异的P值,该多项式概率至少与在“较低”类别的方向上观察到的极端概率更高。 39个设施中有5个的P值<0.10,其中3个低P值的设施是由一名独立评估者进行审查的。我们认为,虽然与该声明相关的警告是此评估程序的强大功能,但与设施评估者和独立评估者之间的系统差异没有证据,这与每个设施审查的案例数量以及预期效果的大小密切相关。我们认为,这提供了一种筛选机制,以识别需要额外采样的设施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号