首页> 外文期刊>Globalizations >The new EU industrial policy: authoritarian neoliberal structural adjustment and the case for alternatives
【24h】

The new EU industrial policy: authoritarian neoliberal structural adjustment and the case for alternatives

机译:欧盟新产业政策:专制新自由主义结构调整和替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2017, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker declared the re-industrialization of the European Union (EU) a top priority. The new EU industrial policy seeks to boost industrial competitiveness and leverage investments into manufacturing, thereby increasing industry's share of EU Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to 20% by 2020. What may appear to be a Keynesian industrial policy and thus a move away from the EU's previous neoliberal agenda, however, seeks to calibrate a further neoliberal structural adjustment in a highly authoritarian fashion. Internal devaluation through devaluing labour, intensifying competition and reducing corporate taxes takes centre-stage. As an auxiliary to the European Semester, national productivity boards have been established to monitor wage developments alongside labour productivity and to suggest policy adjustments when cost competitiveness lags behind the Eurozone average and that of the main trading partners. Not only have formal democratic institutions and organized labour been circumvented in the decision-making process regarding such boards, they will have little voice in the future, and this an area that hitherto fell largely within the scope of member states: wage bargaining. Hence, the new EU industrial policy needs to be discredited, de-legitimized and thus, politicized. A political counter-project, rooted in an alternative industrial policy geared towards fostering horizontal and democratic solidarity economy initiatives which have proliferated since 2008, is discussed in the article's closing pages.
机译:2017年,欧盟委员会主席让·克劳德·容克宣布让欧盟重新工业化为重中之重。新的欧盟工业政策旨在提高工业竞争力并利用对制造业的投资,从而在2020年之前将工业占欧盟国内生产总值(GDP)的比重提高到20%。然而,欧盟先前的新自由主义议程试图以高度专制的方式校准进一步的新自由主义结构调整。通过降低劳动力贬值,加剧竞争和降低公司税来实现内部贬值是核心问题。作为欧洲学期的辅助手段,已经建立了国家生产力委员会,以监督工资水平和劳动生产率的发展,并在成本竞争力低于欧元区平均水平和主要贸易伙伴平均水平时建议政策调整。关于此类委员会的决策过程不仅会规避正式的民主机构和有组织的劳动,而且将来它们的发言权也很少,而这一领域迄今为止在很大程度上属于成员国的范围:工资讨价还价。因此,新的欧盟工业政策需要声名狼藉,去合法化并由此政治化。文章的结尾部分讨论了一项政治反项目,该项目植根于旨在促进横向和民主团结经济倡议的替代性产业政策,该倡议自2008年以来激增。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号