...
首页> 外文期刊>Global trade and customs journal >Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Conviction of Lindsey Manufacturing May Embolden U.S. Authorities, But Should It?
【24h】

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Conviction of Lindsey Manufacturing May Embolden U.S. Authorities, But Should It?

机译:对林赛制造公司(Lindsey Manufacturing)的《反海外腐败法》定罪可能会鼓舞美国当局,但这应该吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On May 10, 2011, a jury verdict in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California made California-based Lindsey Manufacturing Company the first company ever to be criminally convicted of violating the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). In a press statement, the Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer of the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ's) Criminal Division stated that "Lindsey Manufacturing is the first company to be tried and convicted on FCPA violations, but it will not be the last."2rnUnderstanding what led to the first ever criminal conviction of a corporation in the history of a law that is over thirty years old may add to attorneys' understanding of the current and evolving risks their clients face under the FCPA and how best to mitigate those risks. Neither has there been any recent change to U.S. law nor have U.S. authorities announced any official changes to enforcement policy. However, enforcement of anti-bribery laws in the United States, as weR as in other jurisdictions, has become more aggressive and widespread. Increasingly aggressive enforcement also has intensified doubts about the value to corporations of cooperation with the U.S. and other enforcement authorities during FCPA investigations.rnThis evolution of the enforcement landscape seems likely to have contributed to the Lindsey decision to defend against anti-bribery charges, and the conviction may in turn shift companies' calculation as to the benefits of cooperation. Companies worldwide have been watching the Lindsey trial closely and now await the sentence, as a gauge of what outcome may await other companies that choose to fight the U.S. Government in an FCPA case. However, the Lindsey conviction may not necessarily spur greater cooperation with enforcement authorities if current aggressive enforcement trends continue and the benefits of cooperation are sufficiently dubious. Regardless of the final outcome in Lindsey, now more than ever, clients should appreciate the value and importance of implementing an effective FCPA compliance program, as U.S. authorities have now amply demonstrated that they are willing and able to criminally prosecute uncooperative companies under the FCPA.
机译:2011年5月10日,美国加利福尼亚中央区地方法院的陪审团裁决使总部位于加利福尼亚的Lindsey Manufacturing Company成为有史以来第一家因违反《美国反海外腐败法》(FCPA)而被定罪的公司。美国司法部(DOJ)刑事司助理司法部长兰尼·布劳尔(Lanny Breuer)在一份新闻声明中表示:“林赛制造公司是第一家因违反FCPA而受到审判和定罪的公司,但它不会是最后一家。” 2rnUnderstanding导致超过30年的法律历史上首次对一家公司定罪的法律,可能会增加律师对客户在《反海外腐败法》下面临的当前和不断发展的风险以及如何最好地减轻这些风险的了解。美国法律最近没有变化,美国当局也没有宣布对执法政策进行任何正式的变化。但是,与其他司法管辖区一样,美国反贿赂法律的执行变得更加积极和广泛。日益激进的执法行动也加剧了人们对FCPA调查期间与美国和其他执法机构合作的公司的价值的怀疑。执法格局的这种演变似乎可能促使Lindsey决定抗击反贿赂指控,信念可能反过来改变公司对合作收益的判断。全世界的公司一直在密切关注Lindsey案的审判,现在等待判决,以衡量其他选择在FCPA案中与美国政府作斗争的公司可能会面临的结果。但是,如果当前激进的执法趋势继续存在,并且合作的好处令人怀疑,则林赛定罪未必会激发与执法当局的更多合作。无论Lindsey的最终结果如何,现在客户比以往任何时候都应该意识到实施有效的FCPA合规计划的价值和重要性,因为美国当局现已充分表明他们愿意并能够对FCPA下的不合作公司提起刑事诉讼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号